Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Further evidence that WR trumps O-Line as a need (PFF edition).


panther4life

Recommended Posts

I would select a linemen over a WR 9 times out of 10, especially considering there are no outstanding WRs this year....but what do I know?

The only one remotely close to that is Keenan Allen. Even he's not a consensus #1 or to the level of Jones or green a few years back. Sadly Allen is the one worth the 14 in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone that attended games last year will tell you two things.

1. Cam didn't have enough time to throw the football.

2. When he did have time there was usually not an open reciever.

It's a double edged sword both work together. I think WR is the bigger issue as the roster sits at this point. Bell and Amini will continue to get better while I don't think Lafell will ever be a #1 target and we need smitty in the slot to extend his career.

This is a really good post and I could not agree more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the top guys on this list are all mobile QBs (rg3, wilson, vick, luck) do you think the numbers are inflated for them because of their ability (or in Cams case, NEED to) avoid defenders in the pocket before throwing, taking off or taking a sack?

Caz if you think of a play like the 3rd and 11 vs ATL (game 2), he was probably in the pocket with that DT on his back for a good 4 seconds before breaking the LOS. Cam does this sort of thing pretty often so I wouldn't be surprised if it inflated his numbers a good bit.

I'd like to see a list showing how long until a defender forces the QB to make a decision, such as having to avoid a sack, taking a sack, having to check down from pressure, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stat that is missing is time until under pressure. Sometimes a QB will hold onto a ball longer to extend the play because they came under pressure early and couldn't safely get the ball off. I'm not sure if that would necessarily be the case but it's the most relevant stat for this sort of argument.

Sure the 2.5 secs until sack argument could be made, but Cam is mobile enough to mitigate that early rush and buy some time before he gets taken down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OL does need to be improved...providing better protection and a more potent running game (another great friend to a young QB,

However, we also need a dynamic playmaker in the passing game....but I could see that either bring a speedy WR or even a top TE target (2nd round for TE mind you).

Combination if OL and WR in the first two rounds is my hope...in which order depends on who us there at 14 and how our staff feels about the top guys.

Bottom line is that we can't go wrong with either.

I know we do need an infusion at DT, but their bust rate and length of time to really make an impact makes me nervous. Although I would not be upset if we took a top DT at 14 either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OL does need to be improved...providing better protection and a more potent running game (another great friend to a young QB,

However, we also need a dynamic playmaker in the passing game....but I could see that either bring a speedy WR or even a top TE target (2nd round for TE mind you).

Combination if OL and WR in the first two rounds is my hope...in which order depends on who us there at 14 and how our staff feels about the top guys.

Bottom line is that we can't go wrong with either.

I know we do need an infusion at DT, but their bust rate and length of time to really make an impact makes me nervous. Although I would not be upset if we took a top DT at 14 either.

If the Panthers bring in Roy Miller or Casey Hampton or some other vet DT(NT), I can dig going WR/OL with the first two picks. Then focus on the DL in later rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...