Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dwan Edwards Staying


Gucci Mane

Recommended Posts

Your posting is just getting progressively worse.

I'm not sure how, but the huddle idiot index has risen this off season.

UMM I doubt IT. Did I make you mad because I said something controversial that you didn't agree with buddy.

And if it's that bad to you, you can always ignore. But nooo you won't do that. You just love some BIGSYKE don't cha??? LOL

Hate a guy but don't ignore him.....HUDDLE LOGIC!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think it's crazy not to take advantage of 1 of the best DT drafts in years. Many teams will find 10 years starters this year.

I love this draft, but Im not going to go as far as to say that many teams are going to find many 10yrs starters in this draft. You never know what will happen. Injuries, finding the right system, etc. Remember, Alualu, Marvin Austin, Stephen Paea, Ziggy, Jerry, Dorsey, and Ellis all looked really good coming out. They never lived up to be the prospect they were coming out. Never know, maybe Floyd, Star, and Richardson could all bust. If I had to pick one, I would take Star. I think he has the least chance to bust.

I would love to add Alan Branch if Gettleman could somehow pull that out (not likely). Branch is a great NT with tremendous size. He would easily be our best NT in years. I would feel SAFER to have two vet DTs starting in 2013 than a rookie and Dwan, and I would think that Kuechly would love that more. Rookies are almost certain to struggle at DTs their 1st year. Fua might see more PT than he should if we were to go and draft a DT at 14 or 44. Not something I wanna see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple

http://espn.go.com/n...osition/defense

All the top 4 out of the 5 top defense have good DT play.

1. Pitt - Hampton (R1-19)

3. San fran - Sopauga (R4-104) and Justin Smith (R1-4)

4. Seattle - Red Byrant (R4-121), Alan Branch (R2-33), Rocky Benard (R5-146)

5. Chicago - Melton (R4-105) and Paea (R2-53)

Plain simple if you want a top defense you better have good DT play.

Just for perspective I added the round those DT's were picked (although Smith was DE coming out).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love this draft, but Im not going to go as far as to say that many teams are going to find many 10yrs starters in this draft. You never know what will happen. Injuries, finding the right system, etc. Remember, Alualu, Marvin Austin, Stephen Paea, Ziggy, Jerry, Dorsey, and Ellis all looked really good coming out. They never lived up to be the prospect they were coming out. Never know, maybe Floyd, Star, and Richardson could all bust. If I had to pick one, I would take Star. I think he has the least chance to bust.

I would love to add Alan Branch if Gettleman could somehow pull that out (not likely). Branch is a great NT with tremendous size. He would easily be our best NT in years. I would feel SAFER to have two vet DTs starting in 2013 than a rookie and Dwan, and I would think that Kuechly would love that more. Rookies are almost certain to struggle at DTs their 1st year. Fua might see more PT than he should if we were to go and draft a DT at 14 or 44. Not something I wanna see.

The sheer quantity of talented DT coming out this year is the difference. The depth at the position will atleast provide 8 to 9 10 year starters. I'm willing to bet anybody on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No we shouldn't reach for a player just because it's a position of perceived need. You win games by putting the best football players on the field. I love Williams at a NT prospect, but 14 is too high for him....

Get Sylvester Williams in the 2nd round, problem solved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...