Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ginn should be a Panther within next 48 hours per rotoworld


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

That's such a scary thought

it is. and i don't trust anyone on the roster past those two to be anything close to comparable.

it is a very real possibility, tho. and with us being a passing league and having so much money tied up in RBs...the picture just keeps getting uglier and uglier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn would be a nice pick up, based on his STs ability. Nothing more than a #3-4 WR tho. I see AE being cut along with Gettis :( . I think Pilares sticks as a #4-5 WR/slot guy. Adams gets another shot. So IF we pick up Ginn, I see us adding a couple more WRs through FA/draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting Gin would be a great pick up.. Maybe Steve Smith can tutor him into a viable WR. Cut Pickles and let AE be the #3 QB and a back up WR. Let Gettis, Palares, Shaw, and Adams fight for the last WR spot. Those left cut can join the practice squad or go home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was the 4th reciever on a team that runs almost exclusively out of 2 TE and FB sets. He has 2,050 yards and 6 TDs in his career, not gamebreaking stats by far for a top 10 pick with 6 years in the league, but to say he's worthless at receiver isn't completely correct.

He was really the fifth receiver. Crabtree, Manningham, Moss, and Kyle Williams all played significantly more offensive snaps than he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...