Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Star is good to go


IamSoClutch

Recommended Posts

Brandon Hogan's Knee ligiments agree.

However Star has been cleared medically which means they had a detailed MRI to confirm a possible finding. He is good to go!

....Yea, my pawpaw had cancer and the doc told him he had 4-5 years left...muker died 4 months later...they dont know everything...my point being is dont take the chance so we are not disipointed down the road...first round needs to be a Kuechley sure thing...Id be supprised if Getty pulled the trigger on this one...Hell, we passed on Warren Sapp cause he had a little doubage problem....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol Fisher, Ansah and Johnson will very likely go before Star. Warmack is a guard and Trufant is projected as a low 1st. Jesse Williams and John Jenkins stock has taken massive hits as well.

Do you do any research before your post or are you content to post out of your own personal biases?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol Trufant was poor at the combine and had his stock fall. He ran well which drew in the attention of dweebs who don't have enough football IQ to look deeper into the situation, but all reports that surfaced from the combine was that his stock fell and he solidified himself as the 3rd CB on the board

Gee what brilliant insight just a shame it couldn't possibly apply to the poster you attacked who said the same thing

Lol he referenced walterfootball

Im curious how someone is so comfortable continuing to post without having legitimate foundation for the nonsense they post.

This is the third day in a row where you have fabricated absolute crap to try and lead people astray. Is it some poor trolling attempt? Do you get some weird jolly out of passing aroun misinformation to people? I'm trying to cut you some slack by assuming you're trolling because I can't simply believe that someone could possibly be so ignorant of the facts surrounding the topic they're posting about, but your consistence in being so blissfully unaware of what youre talking about makes it more and more difficult to believe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Combine Metrics

40-yard Dash: 4.38

Bench Press: 17

Vertical Jump: 37.5 inches

Broad Jump: 125 inches

20-Yard Shuffle: 3.85

Oh yes, a man with a poor IQ couldn't see that he had a mediocre combine with those results. Nevermind scouts praising his play recognition and versatility in coverage as his best attributes as a CB. Trufant is officially a late-first round talent because Growly says so.

By the by, San Diego's GM has expressed great interest in Trufant since Cason and Jammer are gone. So Desmond could be a very real possibility for The Chargers at 11th.

I'll let you drown in your own nonsense now.

It's apparent you're new to the sport so I'll try to take it easy. I know sites like walterfootball tend to make big deals out of things like 40 times. The drills that scouts care about are the ones that actually exhibit a player performing specific actions that will replicate what they have to do with their position out on the field. As I said, I know it's probably difficult for someone new to the game to log on the Internet, see blog sites making grand displays of his 40 time, and then have the mental discipline themselves that it's meaningless, but if you want to be informed, you'll learn to.

And lol scouts are praising guys who will go in the fourth round as well. Does this mean he'll go there too?

As I said, you need to stop being so defensive and not be angry at someone holding you accountable for your apparent desire to freely pass on fallacies without retribution. I'm doing you a favor as well as the posters you may lead astray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've wasted time and text. Instead of producing this so-called evidence of Trufant underwhelming at the combine (which, ironically, is fabrication, as far as I know), you've proceeded to write paragraphs about my 'character' and intelligence on the Huddle instead -- all time and effort that could have been spent on the subject.

Wow evading the topic at hand is part of your repetiore as well. You truly are the stereotypical Internet loser.

As for the initial matter you dodged, I'm afraid having to link you to Desmond trufant underwhelming at the combine and remaining the 3rd CB prospect in this years draft would be equivalent to having to provide a blind person with evidence that the sky is blue.

I know it. Everyone else knows it. The blind man just can't see it. Lol at you if you think I'm going to sit here and prove the general consensus to you.

"PROVE TO ME THAT PEYTON MANNING IS A GOOD QB!! I DONT BELIEVE YOU AND YOU REFUSE TO SPEND TIME PROVING IT TO ME."

What a sad little world you must live in if it's that sheltered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, once again, youve evaded the matter at hand to rest upon tired internet tactics and ignored the matter at hand.

I don't have to waste my time proving the general consensus to you. It's apparent your vocabulary is limited so I'll elaborate one more time

I don't have to prove something that everyone else knows. I'm not going to bother googling and copying and pasting and blah blah blah to prove general knowledge. It'd be no different than having to prove that Luke Joeckel is believed to go first overall. I could waste my time doing such a thing, but when everyone else believes it, why would I do so because one ignorant soul refuses to see?

As I said, I'm just here to keep you from spreading falsehoods as fact, nothing more, nothing less. Don't let yourself fall into the illusion that I actually have a concern for your opinion when you've shown how comfortable you are ranting about topics you're completely and totally uninformed in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's truly sad that you actually feel the huddle needs a guardian for your posts. That someone would blatantly try to lead people astray (or at least try to imply that's what he's doing because a quick trip to his search engine made him realize what rubbish his comments were) is exactly the kind of thing that doesn't last long around here. So, I'll give you some more friendly advice to try and help you out-if you are indeed trying to intentionally misinform people-and the obvious falsehoods in your initial comments would imply that you are-then Id change my game real quickly because you're looking at a banning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your stupidity astounds me.

Good show.

What's amusing is that you don't realize is this is the same thought the vast majority of this board has had when reading the ridiculous notions you've offered up the past few days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol Fisher, Ansah and Johnson will very likely go before Star. Warmack is a guard and Trufant is projected as a low 1st. Jesse Williams and John Jenkins stock has taken massive hits as well.

Do you do any research before your post or are you content to post out of your own personal biases?

Whoa whoa whoa...

Trufant is a low first rounder and Jesse Williams stock has taken a massive hit? Both of those are completely false.

Do YOU do any research or are you just talking out of your ass again and having a hard time admitting you're wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh good, then your notions have been recorded as well.

You could continue to use this Superiority Complex over the Internet but in this realm (the one outside your ginormous and fictitious ego) your word means... nothing. If you were a true 'veteran' (as you've alluded to) and intellectual of the game, then you would have engaged in a knowledgeable debate citing why you believe Rhodes is the second best CB in the draft and why Trufant is third, but you didn't. You chose to utilize a keyboard warrior mentality (shocking...) -- thus proving that you employ your testicular implants over your brain in any type of conversation. Your obsession with me is a subject for another day.

Returning back on the subject at hand, Rhodes is a raw prospect who is inconsistent in coverage. His tackling form is poor (terrible angles), he lacks elite speed, his footwork and hips aren't fluid, and he can't play a receiver other than in press coverage. You could ask Seminole fans all about those faithful games where receivers and tight ends would blow past Xavier and draw 3-5 penalties from him.

Is he big, athletic and strong? Yes. Is he the second best CB in this draft? No. Does he possess potential? Yes, as a system player.

Rhodes does not have elite speed? He might not be blazing, but a 4.43 is not slow at all man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...