Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Show your face


Bwood

Recommended Posts

Anyone can find any word offensive. It isn't up to anybody to judge what is or isn't offensive to another. Pasty is comparable to darkie and cracker to *ninja*. I was once banned for quoting dave chappelle but have seen others use the dreaded n word in casual conversation. There is a double standard. Ivan is spot on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the point of this apparent "double standard"... The problem, Ivan, is that when you're talking about racial slurs, it's up to that race whether the word was used in an offensive manner. In this case, one non-black person insulted another non-black person, and the second guy's response to that was to respond with racial slurs and epithets towards black people.

What double standard is there? He didn't know PSC wasn't black, but due to his already deeply embedded biases, he assumed he was black and insulted him with derogatory, racist words about black people. The other problem is, this country wasn't founded on the sweat and blood of white people through hundreds of years of systematic slavery and discrimination. So, great... Call me a cracker, milkshake, pasty, pinky, what have you... None of those words are as loaded or as hurtful as the ones been used to oppress and discriminate against blacks for the entire existence of our country.

So, it's a double standard when an idiot assumes another guy is black so he unleashes some deeply seeded racial slurs about black people?

The dude plays water polo, LOL. Slip of the tongue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the point of this apparent "double standard"... The problem, Ivan, is that when you're talking about racial slurs, it's up to that race whether the word was used in an offensive manner. In this case, one non-black person insulted another non-black person, and the second guy's response to that was to respond with racial slurs and epithets towards black people.

What double standard is there? He didn't know PSC wasn't black, but due to his already deeply embedded biases, he assumed he was black and insulted him with derogatory, racist words about black people. The other problem is, this country wasn't founded on the sweat and blood of white people through hundreds of years of systematic slavery and discrimination. So, great... Call me a cracker, milkshake, pasty, pinky, what have you... None of those words are as loaded or as hurtful as the ones been used to oppress and discriminate against blacks for the entire existence of our country.

So, it's a double standard when an idiot assumes another guy is black so he unleashes some deeply held racial slurs about black people?

The dude plays water polo, LOL. Slip of the tongue.

I have already stated I do not condone his actions. Frankly I'm disappointed in Bwood for saying these things.

The double standard remains. You said yourself you are not offended by racial slurs. But not everyone is you. People interpret things differently, regardless of race. This very thread is an example of how lenient or how severe the punishment can be depending on which race is insulted.

It's a sensitive issue, but it seems a lot more lop sided depending on the victim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm salty every time I see someones mid picks become stars while we throw first and second rounders over and over and they all stink outside of Tet (who still has a lot to prove, imo)
    • There is a contingent that is total Bryce but they weathervane with the wind. When the good Bryce wind blows about once or twice a month we hear a lot from them. But they are always pro Bryce, they just don’t pipe up too much when he sucks. I can’t speak for them, as far as what they are looking at.    In a second contingent, the collective mind is made up. He has had had basically three years worth of starts that might include a top tier outing or two, a few second tier outings, offset by about the same number of bottom tier outings which actually may have the edge there.  The rest of his stuff is third tier and that is going to be the bulk of his starts. We want to move on. And we aren’t getting off of that hill until he puts us off of it. He has not.    There is a third contingent that has no conviction and definitely weather vanes. Bryce is good. Bryce isn’t good. Depending on the latest game. They will buy into 7 on 7 success so that should tell you something. 
    • Nacua is really fuging good. He might be a better version of Cooper Kupp.
×
×
  • Create New...