D-Will vs. Maurice Jones Drew

[thefuzz]

Who would I rather have on my team?

Probably Williams, but it would be a very close call. And possibly it would come down to who makes more money.

[nosuchthingasapanther]

jONES drew 2 years starting

Williams = 1

Big difference

jones-drew has only started 4 games in his career.

williams 18.

[CharlotteBeer.com]

Agree with Doc also.

Anyone who has really watched MJD play has to admire his ability.

Yeah, I've got to also agree with Doc here.

Maurice Jones-Drew is a great back. To say they are nowhere close is absurd. Jones-Drew was running behind an awful line last year, while Williams was behind one of the league's best and being spelled by Jonathan Stewart, another very good back.

I do think Williams is a better back, but not by as large a margin as the OP suggests.

[AKPantherFan]

jones-drew has only started 4 games in his career.

williams 18.

That may be true.. MJD carried his team much like Williams has.

They are both good, I would just rather have Williams.

[[email protected]]

I retract my statement that he is not the same caliber back as d-will, but i still think d-will has this no problem. I definitely like Jones Drew and his fearless running. I mean the kid is a nasty back for his height. But as many of you said, I think this year will be a good chance to compare.

[Frizzy350]

the NFC is the toughest division in the NFL

first the NFC is a conference, not a division. you are also horribly incorrect as the AFC has way more consistently dominant teams than the NFC.

Patriots

Colts

Chargers

Ravens

Steelers

Titans

Whereas the NFC has... the Giants, who have been good for two whole years now.

[mantal]

first the NFC is a conference, not a division. you are also horribly incorrect as the AFC has way more consistently dominant teams than the NFC.

Patriots

Colts

Chargers

Ravens

Steelers

Titans

Whereas the NFC has... the Giants, who have been good for two whole years now.

It's pretty much common knowledge that the NFC has caught up with the AFC in the last couple of years. I should have sent you a copy of the memo...

[Brandon]

first the NFC is a conference, not a division. you are also horribly incorrect as the AFC has way more consistently dominant teams than the NFC.

Patriots

Colts

Chargers

Ravens

Steelers

Titans

Whereas the NFC has... the Giants, who have been good for two whole years now.

Why are the Ravens or Titans on that list? I mean seriously.... The Ravens the past 5 years mirror the Panthers, so you'd have to include us for that list, and the Titans are .500 over the past 5 years. Hardly dominant.

Why not include the Giants, Panthers, Eagles, and Packers?