Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OMG! We need new Bigs!


koolkatluke

Recommended Posts

Not that I don't agree...but Biz is playing well tonight with 6 points and 6 boards at half. He has caught two passes for dunks which appeared to be reactionary more than robotic plays where he is thinking.

His hands appearing poor may be the result of him thinking too much and trying to hard which is the result of him being so young and inexperienced. Hopefully he continues to battle down there..he is the toughest dude on the block that we have right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish that Byron was more consistent. I've never seen him as a starter in the future, but he flashes signs of potential for a stretch of 3-4 games and then plays like one of the worst bigs in the league for a solid stretch of 20 games. Maybe it's just the old saying, "every dog has his day."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish that Byron was more consistent. I've never seen him as a starter in the future, but he flashes signs of potential for a stretch of 3-4 games and then plays like one of the worst bigs in the league for a solid stretch of 20 games. Maybe it's just the old saying, "every dog has his day."

Almost every player in the league is capable of playing well in short spurts. The difference between competent NBA players and guys like Mullins who should spend their careers on the end of the bench is consistency. The Bobcats might have the worst frontcourt in NBA history, in the modern era anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Really new bitch??? You want to start off your account by taking shots at me.

Get your post up count before talking to me.

Point proven. lol. I don't need a high post count to observe the fact that both on this board and the Panthers board, you're a consistent troll who lacks a thorough knowledge of the game(s). Good try though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really?  Back to this again? How many times have I said that I’d prefer to trade back from #1? Too many to count, but as I’ve pointed out, that’s going to be much easier said than done, as once we signal we want to trade back, teams will know we don’t want any of the QBs and they’d target the 2nd pick in a trade instead. All of my “T-Mac at #1” talk has been discussed under two circumstances… the first being that no QB or DE pop before the draft, and that we can’t trade back. But again, I know you don’t like to actually read that stuff when I say it, as I’ve said it numerous times.
    • Thanks for posting this. While this was far from a great performance, this critique shows what some of us noticed last week. Bryce played "a little better". There is some talent there. But, as you pointed out we really don't have a great pass blocking line for dropping back each down when we are behind. BY has got some bad habits and physical limitations. At times his teammates let him down. The play calling isn't always the best. I hope he can learn from last week and show us some improvement in the Saints game.
    • Oh, and yes, I’d take a WR first in this upcoming draft, but again, that’s not in a vacuum I wouldn’t have taken him over the QBs this past year or likely the ones next year either. It’s all relative to who is available in a specific draft, and I don’t think any of the QB’s are worth the risk at #1 this year. Also the fact that you’ve said you would take T-Mac #2 but scoff at him going #1 is just in itself, super weird.  How you can justify a player at #2 but not #1 solely because of their position and with complete disregard to the other players available, is absolutely crazy town talk
×
×
  • Create New...