Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Favorite Muscle Car


stirs

Recommended Posts

Yeah. Plenty of room for some ladies and gear for a day out at the beach, park, tailgating, etc.

I have one... A 65 convertible with a small block in it... Not in great shape though... It was my grandads... Bone stock... Gonna keep it original as much as i can. A project for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Mr. Shelby:

1966_ford_gt40-pic-29448.jpeg

And 80s muscle car is an oxymoron. I love Mustangs. Own one. But the Fox body style rapes your eyes.

Well if you're gonna go Shelby....

1967_shelby_cobra-pic-30251.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calling this a muscle car is an insult. This was ferrari killer. Supercar.

An insult to Muscle Cars. That's much more aptly labeled a 2+2 GT, a totally different design philosophy.

Lots of beautiful American automobiles in this thread that dont even come close to the Muscle Car label.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have one... A 65 convertible with a small block in it... Not in great shape though... It was my grandads... Bone stock... Gonna keep it original as much as i can. A project for the future.

lucky you. I'd love to do one of those big cars. Bel Airs, Impalas, and early Chevelle/Malibu/GTO are all great cars with plenty of muscle for me, and plenty of room for whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An insult to Muscle Cars. That's much more aptly labeled a 2+2 GT, a totally different design philosophy.

Lots of beautiful American automobiles in this thread that dont even come close to the Muscle Car label.

I know what a muscle car is and calling a GT40 a muscle car is a slap in the face. We need to change the thread to car porn. That'll settle it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His o loaded with swift, dj, Keenan and Rome was inconsistent at best. The d was bad. And the game management was atrocious and lost them games.  He was terrible and made the team worse. I wish they kept him
    • That is my point.  I think teams make a huge mistake when they pay their decent to average QBs top QB money because they feel that they have to match the market or lose their investment--There is no way, for example, that Tua or Prescott or Murray should all be making more than Mahomes--I mean, Dak makes $15m per season more than Mahomes. People say, "Well, when its his turn...." But that is not how it should be--so my point was that Bryce can be doing mediocre to good enough in 2 years, but the way it is going, you have to pay him at the starting QB rate--currently $60m.  So even if you think he will continue to improve, at $60 m, he would eliminate any chance for a ring---so my view is, if he is not elite, you cut him.  So you draft QBs now and see what you can make of them.
    • With two 4ths and three 5ths I’m hoping we can kill it on adding depth. Take a gamble with the two 7ths.  First 3 picks id love to address the defense. I expect Tuttle, Robinson, and Jewell to all be on the 2025 roster but not after that. Be a good time to add depth and let them develop a year.  
×
×
  • Create New...