Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Once Gamble is Cut, Cornerback Becomes Our Biggest Need


Gallagher

Recommended Posts

We could use one in the draft but I don't think it's necessarily a must 1st or 2nd round pick.

That guy out of Illinois (Hawthorne?) could be an option

I'd like the get a FA upgrade anywhere in the secondary as well. Campbell and Josh Thomas are the two I'm ok with now and like so yes, I'd like to see some improvements. Rome wasn't built in a day so there will likely be some thin positions come the new season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a difference maker when he was healthy.

But yeah, over the past few years, we've kind of had to learn to live without him.

It won't be quite as big a transition as it might have been a few years ago.

see, I keep hearing that fallacy. Before last year, he'd missed a total of six games in four years. Let's not pretend he's Dan Morgan.

While I'm at it for the rest of the thread, Munnerlyn isn't going to be cut, he's a free agent. I really do hope he stays, but there's not a lot of money to go around. After a terrible 2011 (you know, another one of those seasons that Gamble excelled that people write off), Munnerlyn bounced back and really played pretty well, but he's still a nickel guy.

The end result is, renegotiating a 29 year old starter and adding a year or two means a mil or two savings less than the $7.9 mil he'd save, but then your dead money is going toward a player, not an empty slot, and his future years won't cost as much because his proration is done from 2009 this year. So, you could have, essentially, a CB like Gamble for $2 mil, or have the full savings and try to find a starter for $2 mil. I would prefer the player we have personally. But I'm sure there are tons of starters at CB that can cover elite WR at pennies on the dollar, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We won't be releasing Captain because he is a UFA. You can't release a player not under contract.

We have to sign him for him to be on this team this season.

meh...you know what i meant.

we will have either gamble or capt. we won't be without both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

see, I keep hearing that fallacy. Before last year, he'd missed a total of six games in four years. Let's not pretend he's Dan Morgan.

Not talking about his whole career. Just the past three years.

He missed five games in 10 and twelve in 12. Yes, he only missed one in 11, but it's a bad trend, especially at his current cap value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really see it as a trend. I see it as a guy who had one fairly bad injury - a shoulder, nothing catastrophic - and missed a couple games otherwise. And one way or another, he's not going to play at his current cap value.

We'll have to disagree on this one. I don't see 6 games over 2010-11 as "learning to live without him".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really see it as a trend. I see it as a guy who had one fairly bad injury - a shoulder, nothing catastrophic - and missed a couple games otherwise. And one way or another, he's not going to play at his current cap value.

We'll have to disagree on this one. I don't see 6 games over 2010-11 as "learning to live without him".

That's the bottom line of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...