Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jake Delhomme's next starting QB job...

carolinarolls

By carolinarolls,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Guest RT81

Guest RT81

Posted
Posted

the vikings cause they got a system alot like ours great running game,great off line,great defense. jake would sure as hell be a upgrade over jackson for sure. might be the diffrent in them making a sb run cause qb is the only thing holding them back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

Chiefs, Bucs, Jets, Bills, Dolphins, 49ers, Browns, Ravens, Lions, Vikings, Jaguars, Titans, Redskins, Cardinals, Rams, Seahawks, Raiders, plenty of teams in the league worse off at the QB position than we are.

Chiefs have Cassell.

Bucs would.

Jets probably would not because it seems like their set on either Clemmens or Sanchez.

Bills probably wouldn't because they like Trent Edwards.

Dolphins wouldn't because they have Chad Pennington.

49ers would.

Browns would.

Ravens have Flacco.

Lions have Stafford, Culpepper, and Stanton.

Vikes would.

Jaguars have Garrard which is one of their 6 QB's on the roster.

Titans have Collins and VY.

Skins would.

Cards have Warner and Leinert.

Rams have Bulger. (But may take a chance on him)

Seahawks have Hasselbeck, Frye, and Senaca Wallace (Who they like)

Raiders have Garcia and Russell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest RT81

Guest RT81

Posted
Posted

Thats what I said all of yesterday but nobody listened.

least its 2 people here who knows what they talking about!:biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Porn Shop Clerk Enthusiast

Porn Shop Clerk

Posted
Posted

Chiefs have Cassell.

Bucs would.

Jets probably would not because it seems like their set on either Clemmens or Sanchez.

Bills probably wouldn't because they like Trent Edwards.

Dolphins wouldn't because they have Chad Pennington.

49ers would.

Browns would.

Ravens have Flacco.

Lions have Stafford, Culpepper, and Stanton.

Vikes would.

Jaguars have Garrard which is one of their 6 QB's on the roster.

Titans have Collins and VY.

Skins would.

Cards have Warner and Leinert.

Rams have Bulger. (But may take a chance on him)

Seahawks have Hasselbeck, Frye, and Senaca Wallace (Who they like)

Raiders have Garcia and Russell.

And just about any of those could use his influences on the younger QB's or would have him in a heartbeat just in case someone like Hasselbeck went down. Yeah, the Chiefs have Cassell, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't bring Jake in for one or two years to help him out or buffer the transition.

Which of those QBs would you take over Jake? At this point, I wouldn't take any of them over Jake, though I'd be willing to give Cassell and Garrard a shot.

Warner and Leinert....eh....Warner doesn't have much left in him I think, but we'll see. And Leinert is still a gamble. Nope, there's nobody on that list up there that wouldn't at least give Jake some serious consideration if he were on the open market, I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

And just about any of those could use his influences on the younger QB's or would have him in a heartbeat just in case someone like Hasselbeck went down. Yeah, the Chiefs have Cassell, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't bring Jake in for one or two years to help him out or buffer the transition.

Which of those QBs would you take over Jake? At this point, I wouldn't take any of them over Jake, though I'd be willing to give Cassell and Garrard a shot.

Warner and Leinert....eh....Warner doesn't have much left in him I think, but we'll see. And Leinert is still a gamble. Nope, there's nobody on that list up there that wouldn't at least give Jake some serious consideration if he were on the open market, I think.

I agree with you those are about the only one's I would take a look at over Jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Mentor

X-Clown

Posted
Posted

One other unturned stone in this discussion is that you also have to look at the financial commitments that some of these teams have made to another younger quarterback. Prime example being Chiefs and Matt Cassel or the Jets and Mark Sanchez. These two guys are largely unproven, but the fact that they have been signed for so much more money than Jake means that the team probably is going to be willing to live and die with the guy that they've given the up front money to. Case in point, last year at this time Leinart was the favorite to win the starting job in AZ, and really had it up until a horrendous preseason game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
User Name Explorer

User Name

Posted
Posted

IDK, I think it's pretty simple, Jake is what the organization wants. And although I'm not a fan of him, I'll go ahead and reverse it.

If one of the other middle of the pack QB's were released tomorrow which one could beat Jake out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ed bell Newbie

ed bell

Posted
Posted

I'd love to hear what fans of other organizations would say to the same question. Let's face it, the QB position is a target for criticism when things aren't going right. Personally, I think you could plug him in to at least 10 teams and have a short term performance upgrade. The wildcard is the leadership quotient. He has that ability and it's not something you see everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
guyinchesapeake Newbie

guyinchesapeake

Posted
Posted

I personally think the best fit(s) for Jake are with Baltimore or Miami. I don't think Pennington is any better than Jake, and he certainly has the edge in playoff performance (the last one not withstanding). I think Jake could possibly bring a fire to them that's missing.

Same with the Ravens. They have their guy of the future in Flacco, but I don't think he's quite ready to be that guy just yet. He's been 'blooded', he has some serious experience now, but he didn't show enough "it" consistently thru the season, or in the playoffs, even for a rookie. I think the Ravens, and Flacco, could benefit from having Jake there in the starting job for this upcoming season. But AFTER this season, if Jake's still the guy, then there will no doubt be problems with keeping Flacco.

Of course, none of this will happen. But it's always fun to speculate..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...