Yea its a BR Mock dammit!

[carolina-chuck]

My God this sounds amazing.

Yea we should've passed up on Cam bc we had Jimmy, and on Luke bc we had Beason right????

Taking BPA, almost, always give you an immediate starter who can impact at a high level.

[Ricky Spanish]

taking jones make no sense. I mean literally no sense. We have much more pressing needs at DT, OL, WR, and DB. no reason in hell that we should take him.

[carolina-chuck]

BPA that also fills a need is how you build good football teams....

If BPA is a RB, LB, etc and it isn't a need....you are better off drafting someone with a comparable grade at a more important position for your team

Like I just comment on another post, should we have passed up on Cam/Luke (BPA)? We had a hyped up QB in Clausen and a Pro Bowler in Beason.

BPA gives you a better chance to find Football Players. Players who going to impact at a high level.

[chknwing]

"This is my mock, there are many like it but this one is mine."

[carolina-chuck]

taking jones make no sense. I mean literally no sense. We have much more pressing needs at DT, OL, WR, and DB. no reason in hell that we should take him.

Taking Kuechly last year make no sense also when we had pressing needs at DT, CB, etc.

Sure, I'd be stupid to say for us to take Jarvis in the top5, but at 14 anyone would be stupid to pass him up.

[SCP]

OLB????

Is BR an acronym for Buncha Retards?

[carolina-chuck]

"This is my mock, there are many like it but this one is mine."

.

You made that?

[carolina-chuck]

The only person I would take over Jarvis at 14, would be Warmack. Other than that you kiddin me?

People who talk about needs, would yall at no.14:

Take Hankins/Floyd/Richardson/Jesse over Jarvis?

Take Keenan/Patterson/Twill/Hopkins over Jarvis?

Take Barrett/Cooper/Warford over Jarvis?

Take Reid/McDonald/Elam/etc over Jarvis?

Take Rhodes/Banks/etc over Jarvis?

[Growl]

Trying too hard brah

Look guys he said brah he's a top level poster now

[davos]

I like Rick Wagner. I definitely trust Wisconsin o-lineman in the NFL and he's been very good for them. Don't know why he isn't higher in some rankings.

[Dex]

I wonder if Leon Sandcastle will be there when we pick... Pipe dream. Oh well.

[Growl]

So we see chuck's youtube formed player rankings have led him to believe that we should either take an OG or a LB.

Incoincidentally, two of the easiest positions to hit on because any brain dead imbecile knows what to look for.

Unsuprisingly, as his draft forum track record has indicated, not only can chuck not "scout" players, he doesn't even know what he's looking at when watching anything with any degree of complexity

[davos]

The only person I would take over Jarvis at 14, would be Warmack. Other than that you kiddin me?

People who talk about needs, would yall at no.14:

Take Hankins/Floyd/Richardson/Jesse over Jarvis?

Take Keenan/Patterson/Twill/Hopkins over Jarvis?

Take Barrett/Cooper/Warford over Jarvis?

Take Reid/McDonald/Elam/etc over Jarvis?

Take Rhodes/Banks/etc over Jarvis?

Considering our team and what move would have the maximum effectiveness, I'd take Banks, Rhodes, & Patterson over Jarvis. Now if John Jenkins fell at DT/NT, I'd take him in a heart beat but this Bulldog at OLB? We have one in TD already. This isn't an Anderson replacement. Rest of the draft is good though.

[carolina-chuck]

So we see chuck's youtube formed player rankings have led him to believe that we should either take an OG or a LB.

Incoincidentally, two of the easiest positions to hit on because any brain dead imbecile knows what to look for.

Unsuprisingly, as his draft forum track record has indicated, not only can chuck not "scout" players, he doesn't even know what he's looking at when watching anything with any degree of complexity

Lol funny.

Atleast I'm the only person on here who'll admit I'm not good at scouting. If I was or any of you guys are, y'all be getting paid right now Lookin at 2013 NFL prospects. Yea, that's not watching 5-8mim highlights on YouTube and considering it "films".