Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3-4 Look For Carolina? Quoted from ESPN Insider


Russian Bear

Recommended Posts

Ya bro you know so much about football.

Are you insinuating that Beason, Anderson, Keuchly, and Davis would actually make a good set of 3-4 linebackers?

That the assumption made when a team has "four starting quality linebackers", despite the fact that they are 4-3 backers, means that a team can successfully transition said linebackers into a 3-4 scheme, is somehow not retarded?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I read and seen on Panthers.com McDermott wants to sprinkle in more 3-4 looks using all of our LBers and different looks out of the 3-4.

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Panthers-ponder-3-4-possibilities-/88d6cba7-0cc1-43ff-ab7f-f3273723df86

"That's a very good question," McDermott said. "When those four are healthy, there's a chance we'll experiment more with that. We've thrown a little bit of it out there, particularly on third down.

"Would we like to do more? Absolutely. How much of it? We'll see."

McDermott doesn't plan to overhaul the base 4-3 scheme that's been in place since he arrived in 2011, but he hopes to use some 3-4 looks in third down situations.

The reason? In addition to allowing four of the defense's better players to see the field at the same time, pressures out of a 3-4 scheme can be more varied and create more confusion for an offense.

"Let's face it, we're all creatures of habit, and offensive linemen are used to looking for jerseys with 90 on them," McDermott said. "When you can hide that fourth and fifth rusher, and those rushers come with a 50 number on, or a 40 number or 20 number at times with our pressure packages, that's where you create problems and confusion."

These are words straight out of McDermott's mouth, how can any of yall dispute this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I read and seen on Panthers.com McDermott wants to sprinkle in more 3-4 looks using all of our LBers and different looks out of the 3-4.

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Panthers-ponder-3-4-possibilities-/88d6cba7-0cc1-43ff-ab7f-f3273723df86

These are words straight out of McDermott's mouth, how can any of yall dispute this?

Because we've used situational 3-4 hybrid defenses for years.

Most teams do.

But we won't be making any big time switches unless there are some serious personnel moves this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because we've used situational 3-4 hybrid defenses for years.

Most teams do.

But we won't be making any big time switches unless there are some serious personnel moves this offseason.

Yes the Panther's have been running some 3-4 hybrid defenses on certain downs and distances, but he wants to run it more. No changes to the base defense, but even more 3-4 looks then the panther's have been using in the past. Of course he also said that last off season as well, not sure if injuries stopped that plan or what happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't need anymore LBs but if he somehow managed to slip to us, you MUST take him.

He's the best FB player in the draft.

walterfootball is mocking him at like #17. they're claiming that scouts think he's going to flop at the combine and fall into the mid first.

i mean if we want a pass rusher that can pretty much line up anywhere...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet another person who thinks you can just plug any random 4 linebackers into a 3-4 as long as they're "starting caliber."

Was expecting Bleacher Report, turned out to be ESPN. Same level of research I guess.

If you disguised the website, you could use bleacher report and ESPN atricles interchangeably.

You're right tho, 3-4 OLBs are guys like Ware, Suggs, and Aldon Smith. Not Jon Beason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wait until all the Bryce haters wake up haha Bryce would have been a perfect score yesterday if not for a couple of throws.  One was not throwing it to Thielen in the middle of the field and the 3rd and 2 on the last drive of regulation.  He rushed that throw and needs to set his feet and complete it.   He still has a long way to go to reach his potential, needs to get more consistent but yesterday was a great way to bounce back from 4 turnovers last week.  3 TDs, 0 turnovers, 226 total yards.  Solid day.
    • the gameplan was very QB friendly.    That aspect has a lot to do w/ the odds of ending up w/ a good grade.   Heavy run w/ a safe/conservative pass plan. 
    • I hate to be KB’s defender but that was on the ref 5 yards from KB and the CB. The play should have been stopped immediately. KB knew he touched the CB and the play was reviewed and overturned for a touchback because the CB was down. It all goes back to protecting QBs. I have no doubt that if Brady was the QB, the whistle blows because you’d be letting a potential dangerous play continue for no reason. We saw our own TD get suspended for a blindside block on Adams on an interception return. Cam was QB and this was 2016, so no whistle. KB has no idea that Cam will hurt himself trying to tackle. It’s not his call to blow the whistle. I understand he could have just tried to tackle the guy, but he and the asshole ref are the only guys who know the play will be overturned on review. Also, 9 other offensive players didn’t make the tackle and I’ll bet that if we go frame by frame there are a few not giving 100%. The refs spent all of 2016, from the SB to week 1 to this game not protecting Cam ever. The zebra right next to the play should have stopped a dangerous play, period.
×
×
  • Create New...