49ers outgained Ravens 182-93 (6.3-2.7 ypc) on the ground

[Delhommey]

If you put up 29 points and lose, I don't think your offense is your problem.

[frash.exe]

I don't think "simpering" is the word you were looking for

So what exactly are you saying - run a lot, but not well?

I still like my way better - run well, pass well, stop the run, put pressure on the QB, cover receivers, cover kicks well, return kicks well. Usually you will win.

But your argument is that we need to run not so well to win? Or what is it?

You're right that the modern NFL doesn't rely on a dominant run game as in years past. That's a revelation to exactly no one. If Baltimore had been able to run well, Do you think the Niners would have made such a ferocious comeback?

It goes back to spending the most money out of any team and getting no success out of it, despite being promised success from the team as well as many posters on here. You must not be part of the group I am addressing if what i'm saying isn't new information for you. So the only other reason why you came in here is the same reason I get the same mediocre posters coming in to threads I create and bringing nothing but potential heart failure to the table. Because some time ago I made them look like an idiot and it got them mad. Is that why you walked into this thread? Because I made an ass out of you weeks ago?

[Chimera]

When was this hypothetical ass making?

Don't feel special - if a thread is on the first page, I usually read it. I replied because I know you are more intelligent than "the ravens won because they had fewer rushing yards, therefore, we need to rush worse... I'm not talking about attempts; just rush worse"

I wanted to know what your real point was. Apparently it's just another whinefest about the overpaid backfield.