Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy "Meth-head" Mayfield


dimbee

Recommended Posts

Way to go, Jeremy. I hope you never drive a race car again.

Idiot.

Dont take this personally Dimbee, but do some research.

http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/amphetamines/amphetamines.shtml This is the link that gives basic info about Adderall.

http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/amphetamines/amphetamines_testing.shtml Scroll down on this one and you will see a list of medications (prescribed and over the counter) that will set off a false positive for amphetamines in a drug test. Basically, if you've had an allergy issue, or sinus infection and you were taking Sudafed for it, then theres a safe bet you'd turn up positive for methamphetamine in a drug test.

It was said a couple weeks ago when all this broke that he was on a prescription for ADHD. I can only assume he was taking Adderall, which is one of the most common medications given for ADHD. Adderall is an amphetamine and will turn up as methamphetamine in most drug tests.

Until its proven what exactly he took, then I'm with cptx in sayin get off the horse.......for the time being. If it is proven that he was taking crystal meth then I can safely say I will be behind you 110% in that he shouldn't be allowed to drive a race car again. Until then, remember: Don't believe everything you read in a newspaper or see on TV, journalists are all too quick to jump the gun. Innocent until proven guilty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amphetamines = Methamphetamines?

http://sports.espn.go.com/rpm/nascar/cup/news/story?id=4245969

NASCAR driver Jeremy Mayfield tested positive for methamphetamine during a random drug screening May 1 at Richmond International Raceway, ESPN The Magazine has learned from two independent sources.

"Two independent sources"

I don't pretend to know everything that happened and, hey, if it turns out that it was a false positive due to meds for ADHD (in a 40 year old man) and a double dose of Claritin, then I'll apologize for my believing what I read.

If it turns out correct, I hope he never drives in NASCAR again, because that is completely irresponsible (to his own safety and the other 40 or so drivers on the tracks safety) to be driving while high on Meth. That poo is evil incarnate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amphetamines = Methamphetamines?

http://sports.espn.go.com/rpm/nascar/cup/news/story?id=4245969

"Two independent sources"

I don't pretend to know everything that happened and, hey, if it turns out that it was a false positive due to meds for ADHD (in a 40 year old man) and a double dose of Claritin, then I'll apologize for my believing what I read.

If it turns out correct, I hope he never drives in NASCAR again, because that is completely irresponsible (to his own safety and the other 40 or so drivers on the tracks safety) to be driving while high on Meth. That poo is evil incarnate

Yes, you can test positive for meth because of Adderall. I have had it happen to me before. And there is a form of adult ADHD. It isn't just a disease for kids. I work with a guy who has the attention span of a gerbil unless he takes his adderall and he is well into his 40's, now as to why Mayfield has never tested positive for this before if he has indeed been taking the stuff for awhile is a mystery to me. I'm sure this isn't the first time he has been tested.

REGARDLESS of any of this he-said, she-said poo poo, I highly doubt it is a good idea in any stretch of the imagination to drive a car at 200mph while doped up on a double dose of Claritin and ADHD meds. That guy had to have been looped out of his mind after taking that combination, like I said I have been on Adderall before and it makes you spaced out enough, I couldnt comprehend putting allergy meds on top of that.

As I said before, I agree with you 100%. Meth is garbage and nothing good ever comes out of its use. Whether it be on a race track, or on the streets. It's a nasty, nasty drug and if he did drive while on that $hit then not only should he be suspended for life from NASCAR, but he should also face criminal charges for wreckless endangerment, among other things.

I tend to wait until are the facts are known, but so far as I can tell.....things dont look too good for Mr. Mayfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Just saw the story on espn. Sure does sound fishy. Unless his stepmom has some type of axe to grind. It's always sad when althletes/drivers throw away everything for drugs or alcohol or gambling etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me crazy, but I believe Jeremy on this. I just don't think he could be so stupid to use meth after the first "positive test" and fighting so hard to disprove it and get back to the track. Something just seems fishy about this whole situation. I think NASCAR is for some reason or another, trying to get Mayfield out of the sport. Maybe it's because he successfully got a suspension lifted, or maybe for some other reason, but this whole situation seems too fishly for me.

Plus the article said that since the first positive test that Mayfield has had himself privately tested 6 time, and all have been negative. I find it way too fishy that the lab NASCAR is using has found Mayfield positive twice, but the lab Mayfield has been using has found him negative 6 times.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nascar/news;_ylt=AoPq7nE4EQzFNo3.1JktmvE5nYcB?slug=txnascarmayfieldsuspen&prov=st&type=lgns

^^bottom fourth of the page is where it says that he's been tested 6 times

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of immature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.   
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...