Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anybody into Trance?


SCMunnerlyn1

Recommended Posts

MY GOD FINALLY

look up some Kaskade, Deadmau5, Morgan Page, and Paul Oakenfold for Trance to start off

Dada Life and Wolfgang Gartner are some good House options...

And for dubstep, take a look at Nero, Flux Pavilion, Krewella. Ephixa has some nice instrumental tracks, and these two artists on youtube collaborate frequently to add lyrics to some of those tracks. Look up Veela and NoneLikeJoshua

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good god tiesto is horrible... my music festival family have substituted the word poo for tiesto ever since he headlined Electric Forest Festival two years ago and everybody laughed their asses off at his set

some EDM to check out:

emancipator - new album out that's awesome

bassnectar for the dubstep

GRiZ

Pretty Lights (and anybody on his label - Michael Menert, Break Science, Gramatik, SuperVision, Paper Diamond... his whole label is available for free on his site here and here)

Girl Talk

Big Gigantic

Zeds Dead

and for the jamtronica stuff which i really prefer:

Lotus

Conspirator

Papadosio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul Oakenfold is a douche that could never even beat match and wears platforms to hide his dwarfish height.

Paul van Dyke's not been mentioned. Sandra Collins and Christopher Lawrence were always underrated American talents. Sasha and Digweed's first few Northern Exposure mixes were good too, but more laid back.

Goa trance is for folks that took one too many pills. Psy is for those who took even more past that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...