Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DCK Mock Draft

DaCityKats

By DaCityKats,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

u really like brandon mcgee??? have not heard much about him but "da u" players are known to be avg in college and play great in the nf....in the late 2000's...guess its the coaches fault.

oh and about allen...i dont really see game breaking speed in him. maybe i have not watched enough tape..but ive never seen him runaway from guys like t-will or vols wr's.

Keenan is more of a possession receiver. Think Jordy Nelson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TMS3426 Newbie

TMS3426

Posted
Posted

what dont you guys like about a guy who has produced with inconsistent QB play for 3 years in a row?on top of being the only true threat at WR so teams rolled coverages and game planned around stopping him.

I don't think he's fast enough. I'd take Patterson before him if I was taking a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

I don't think he's fast enough. I'd take Patterson before him if I was taking a WR.

There's a lot of great "not fast" wrs in this league. No GM other than Al Davis base everything on speed.

I'm having a hard time thinking Patterson will be drafted ahead of Keenan. Keenan is the better overall WR at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TMS3426 Newbie

TMS3426

Posted
Posted

There's a lot of great "not fast" wrs in this league. No GM other than Al Davis base everything on speed.

I'm having a hard time thinking Patterson will be drafted ahead of Keenan. Keenan is the better overall WR at the moment.

I don't care if he's better at this time. Why wouldn't you want the guy who is going to be better in the long run? I realize there are good WR's that don't have top end speed, I just wouldn't want to take one of those guys in the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

I don't care if he's better at this time. Why wouldn't you want the guy who is going to be better in the long run? I realize there are good WR's that don't have top end speed, I just wouldn't want to take one of those guys in the first round.

How do you know he'll be the better receiver in the long run?

The most solid and sure receiver at this point is Keenan. He's already polished, but the ceiling is low on him. Patterson ceiling is above sky but at the same time he's also the closest thing that could bust in the next level. It's a 50:50 with Patterson. Either he'll boom or bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
IamSoClutch Newbie

IamSoClutch

Posted
Posted

How do you know he'll be the better receiver in the long run?

The most solid and sure receiver at this point is Keenan. He's already polished, but the ceiling is low on him. Patterson ceiling is above sky but at the same time he's also the closest thing that could bust in the next level. It's a 50:50 with Patterson. Either he'll boom or bust.

Are you not concerned with his injury history?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...