Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A quick Look back at Chud

micnificent28

By micnificent28,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

http://www.charlotte...chudzinski.html

I think to much of the huddle has taken chud for granted. He spoiled us with putting up over 24 points a game and a load of exsplosive plays. I for one and very upset with this news. Chud was the best coach in carolina for the last 2 years and maybe the best offensive mind we've evere had.

I know some would disagree, but I think Henning was better. Took less, and did more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimpdaddy Grand Master

Pimpdaddy

Posted
Posted

Just because he can put together a few risky explosive plays does not make him some mastermind that turned this offense around. Let's not forget the screen passes he calls at our own endzone and the read-option plays when we are trying to hold a lead late in the 4th. Let's also not forget how the unanimous best pair of RBs in the NFL quickly turned into an afterthought when playing against Carolina.

....fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Way Truth Life Newbie

Way Truth Life

Posted
Posted

I know some would disagree, but I think Henning was better. Took less, and did more.

Took less? Henning required stud RBs and 3 legit WRs and still couldn't score more than 21 points unless it was against the Patriots in the super bowl. Watching Henning ball was torture.

Please don't say that again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

Took less? Henning required stud RBs and 3 legit WRs and still couldn't score more than 21 points unless it was against the Patriots in the super bowl. Watching Henning ball was torture.

Please don't say that again.

Are you trying to tell me that we don't have the best trio of RBs in the league? And we do have this QB named Cam Newton. Let's not forget Greg Olsen, LaFell and Murphy (for what their worth). I can easily argue that this team is more talented on offense (even though we are sans Muhammad). We just have to put these fine tools into the right hands.

Was it so-called "Henning ball" or Foxball that was the real thorn in our side?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Way Truth Life Newbie

Way Truth Life

Posted
Posted

Are you trying to tell me that we don't have the best trio of RBs in the league? And we do have this QB named Cam Newton. Let's not forget Greg Olsen, LaFell and Murphy (for what their worth). I can easily argue that this team is more talented on offense (even though we are sans Muhammad). We just have to put these fine tools into the right hands.

Was it so-called "Henning ball" or Foxball that was the real thorn in our side?

Henning's offense required more components and scored MUCH less....so....NO it was not as effective as Chuds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

Henning's offense required more components and scored MUCH less....so....NO it was not as effective as Chuds.

You're entitled to your opinion. Chud was arguably the biggest root of our problem this past season. He misused his tools. Let him take his cute ugliness to Cleveland. He will fit right in. We'll see what an offensive savant he is there, plus we'll see if it was more of a case that he was actually hindering Cam and our offense here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Way Truth Life Newbie

Way Truth Life

Posted
Posted

So implementing what was basically a college offence this past season wasn't a big part of why we missed the play-offs?

Chud was a big reason why we finished with a losing record this season.

NO

Losing 5 4th quarter leads and 6 2nd half leads is the PROBLEM!!!

Clock management, poor defense adjustments in the 4th and Rivera's inexperience at closing out games is the reason we missed the playoffs.

DAMN THIS PLACE IS DENSE!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

i'm not about to stand up for the guy by any means.

i also don't buy the notion that he did "more with less" because i'd kill for a smith-in his prime moose-proehl WR corps right now myself.

I am not disagreeing about the WRs, but you can't discount our RB corps. We have three pass-catching, potential stud RBs along with Smitty (who is STILL a stud), not to mention a stud TE and a supporting cast of WRs (that can probably fill in the gaps quite nicely).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Way Truth Life Newbie

Way Truth Life

Posted
Posted

I am not disagreeing about the WRs, but you can't discount our RB corps. We have three pass-catching, potential stud RBs along with Smitty (who is STILL a stud), not to mention a stud TE and a supporting cast of WRs (that can probably fill in the gaps quite nicely).

I would take Foster and Davis duo over DW and Stewart everyday of the week and twice on Sunday!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

NO

Losing 5 4th quarter leads and 6 2nd half leads is the PROBLEM!!!

Clock management, poor defense adjustments in the 4th and Rivera's inexperience at closing out games is the reason we missed the playoffs.

DAMN THIS PLACE IS DENSE!!!!

You are adding to the denseness with some kind of obvious affinity to use the word "dense". It's all just a matter of opinion and analysis. Your opinion is not validated by your use of the word "dense".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mav1234
      Passing yards per game leaders

      By mav1234 · Posted

      I mean it's not even like this was his worst game of the season... I'm not done with him by any means but this feels more the norm for him than the exception:/
    • mav1234
      BREAKING: Panthers Announce Four Moves Including LB Trevin Wallace To IR

      By mav1234 · Posted

      I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Gapanthersfan
      Would you trade Ickey

      By Gapanthersfan · Posted

      Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
×
×
  • Create New...