Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton took the most hits as a QB


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

Warmack OG Bama'

The guy is a straight mauler and as close to a can't miss project as possible. The interior of our line with Amini, Kalil, and Warmack would be good for a very long time.

I know guards don't normally go to high but Warmack is a great prospect. Considering the money Carl Nicks got, I think Warmack would be a great pick at 14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can't afford 3 pro bowlers on the interior. that RG slot is always going to be a lower end starter. We do need a legit LT tho. A big BIG boy that hates everything about defensive lineman.

Doesn't have to be a pro bowler. Just has to be capable. We had a great season with Keydrick Vincent plugged in.

That said, I do want to see a high pick used on OL, and I'd be fine with Warmack if we got him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it amusing that the only reason this info came out is because ESPN was digging around to find someone to blame for Griffin getting injured. I dont think anyone on ESPN at any time, mentioned how little time Cam had in the pocket.

This can't be true.

We were assured many times yesterday by the Luck swallowers that the reason his completion % was so abysmal this year was because he played behind the worst OL in the NFL.

So you take that back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...