Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any pro baseball experts here? This thread involves Goodwill.

jasonluckydog

By jasonluckydog,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

charlotte49er Newbie

charlotte49er

Posted
Posted

I think the Cubs one is Kevin Foster, P in the early 90's.

Trouble is Foster wore #'s 31 & 32 while with the Cubbies. (Sadly, he dided at age 39 from cancer.)

According to what I can find out, no Foster ever wore the #3 & #7 Cubs uniform. But Kevin may have worn it in Spring Training. Sometimes it takes new players who survive spring trianing to get their official number.

Kevin Foster(1994, 1997-98), #31 (Maybe wore #3 during spring Training 1994?

Kevin Foster(1995-96), #32 Maybe wore #7 during Spring Training 1995?

Every Major league Ballplayer

Zach Stewart 2011 - 2012

Phil Stidham 1994 - 1994

Dave Stieb 1979 - 1998

Fred Stiely 1929 - 1931

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCP Enthusiast

SCP

Posted
Posted

That Marlins jersey looks like it is from the 2000-2005 era. I think Majestic started making MLB jerseys in 2006? I had season tickets to the Marlins that entire time and don't remember a Stickish. That has to be a custom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted

I think the Cubs one is Kevin Foster, P in the early 90's.

I'm a Cubs fan and there was a pitcher named Kevin Foster who played for them in the 90s. Good player but those aren't the numbers he wore. Foster passed away a couple years ago.

Pretty sure OP bought custom jersey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • Carolina Mike
      2024 College Football Thread

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...