Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Coaching / GM News


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

This is just my speculation, but I think Reid will end up in KC. If only for the reason that the Chiefs would be willing to bring in Heckart and I don't think Arizona are willing to do that for Reid.

I'm not sure about the Buffalo job or the Chicago jobs, but I think Kelly will get like 5-6 Million a year from the Browns and take it. McCoy will go to the Cardinals if he jumps and of course Reid to KC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really surprised at the lack of "OH EM GEE, RAY LEWIS IS RETIRING!!! J.R. SHOULD HIRE HIM AS A COACH!!!" threads thus far lol. I thought at least one of the dumbasses around here would have made one by now.

Too much natural talent to be a good coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/02/eagles-front-office-heads-to-atlanta-to-interview-nolan-armstrong/

Instead, Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie, President Don Smolenski and General Manager Howie Roseman are currently aboard a flight to Atlanta, where they’ll interview Falcons defensive coordinator Mike Nolan and special teams coordinator Keith Armstrong.Atlanta offensive coordinator Dirk Koetter was initially expected to interview with the Eagles as well, but Koetter pulled himself out of contention for any head-coaching jobs today after signing a new contract with the Falcons.

Broncos offensive coordinator Mike McCoy is also expected to interview with the Eagles, and several reports have said the Eagles are interested in Oregon coach Chip Kelly and Penn State coach Bill O’Brien as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...