Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Coaching / GM News


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

See above.

If he gets an interview, it should be only to pat him on the back before sending him back to his old job.

So no, I'm still not taking it seriously.

Exactly.

Look at it this way, if Beane decides to move on, a future employer will look at this & say "Went with the football guy huh? Well, that makes sense." If they didn't give him a interview that could change to "Wow... didn't even give him a second look after he had the job. He must suck."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are people on the Huddle that I'd trust more than Beane to be a GM. If we're throwing personnel experience completely out the window, then what's the difference? There are people here who have actually run a business and managed people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could also argue it would be a mistake to set Cam Newton backwards....

That could be a bigger deal than the importance of bringing in a slightly better "game day manager" than Rivera. Bc X's and O's....Rivera's got that.

Look, Cam is a smart and young guy. Bringing in someone new isn't going to hurt him. If anybody comes in I believe it would be an offensive guy and it would make him that much better. I respect your opinion but Rivera is not the guy who is going to give us back to back winning seasons and lead us to the playoffs.

My gut feeling is if we bring Rivera back he may end up being fired by week 5 and we wasted another season when somebody else could have done better. We have seen all we are going to get from Rivera and that's mediocre at best.

I don't know about you guys but 4 winning season out of 18 is pretty damn bad. Fox got fired because he couldn't put together back to back winning seasons. We have had two losing seasons with Rivera already. What makes you think his third year will be any different? The last team that thought a coach needs a third year was the Bills and that turned out horrible with one of the best defenses and Gailey was fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't take 3 years for a HC to show he's capable of leading a team into the playoffs and beyond, unless they're an EXTREMELY bad team. We had the pieces to at-least be competing for a wildcard spot and couldn't even do that

Lmao! Competing for a wild card? We was out of contention before Thanksgiving. It's odd that the 2-14 Colts with the horrible offensive line, horrible, secondary, and one good WR in Reggie Wayne has done better then the Panthers.

The Panthers has underachieved big time this season. It spells trouble when we end up with the same record as the no HC Saints and the rookie HC Greg Schiano who swept us this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, Cam is a smart and young guy. Bringing in someone new isn't going to hurt him. If anybody comes in I believe it would be an offensive guy and it would make him that much better. I respect your opinion but Rivera is not the guy who is going to give us back to back winning seasons and lead us to the playoffs.

My gut feeling is if we bring Rivera back he may end up being fired by week 5 and we wasted another season when somebody else could have done better. We have seen all we are going to get from Rivera and that's mediocre at best.

I don't know about you guys but 4 winning season out of 18 is pretty damn bad. Fox got fired because he couldn't put together back to back winning seasons. We have had two losing seasons with Rivera already. What makes you think his third year will be any different? The last team that thought a coach needs a third year was the Bills and that turned out horrible with one of the best defenses and Gailey was fired.

New offense and new schemes and new coaches....definitely would slow his development. To what extent is a guess.

Cam eventually will/should be good enough that coaching becomes less important. That is the only reason I support stability around Cam vs change. Eventually, you can have a Fox/Manning type scenario. Where the coach isn't much of a factor on offense.....Cam IMO will get there. Coaching changes while he is young I fear slows that aspect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys might recall multiple sources reporting that Jim Harbaugh was a candidate for our head coaching job too.

Things have a tendency to take on a life of their own once someone from the media puts them out there.

While I have nothing more to go on other than Gantt's comments, I believe we were in fact interested in Harbaugh. I also believe we were summarily told that he had no interest in us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe people are actually using the development of Cam as a defense of Rivera. I sometimes wonder if Rivera is actually trying to ruin Cam. We need to get him a real coach who knows how to develop QBs and ditch this terrible excuse of an offense that Rivera and Chud keep trying to force down his throat. These are some of the most important developmental years of a QBs career and we are wasting them with amateurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe people are actually using the development of Cam as a defense of Rivera. I sometimes wonder if Rivera is actually trying to ruin Cam. We need to get him a real coach who knows how to develop QBs and ditch this terrible excuse of an offense that Rivera and Chud keep trying to force down his throat. These are some of the most important developmental years of a QBs career and we are wasting them with amateurs.

huh? Shula is an excellent qb coach. Rivera really has little impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...