Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yet another Chip Kelly source/rumor


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Matthias is correct that we have run more effectively as we have dialed back the read option. I think we ran it once against San Diego.

We have also begun to sprinkle in more pistol plays of the type featured in Washington.

We have seen our offense be very efficient with a nice mix of under center and shotgun plays that utilize play action and the traditional shotgun handoff. I would hate to see us go back to a heavy reliance on read option. That extra second or two of delay involved in the read option is often just enough for the defense to catch up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be so if he came to Carolina. To run that offense is like trying to run the wildcat offense. Except our guy can throw the ball. I for one don't want my QB, held back by such an elementary offense. I want Cam to excel in passing, and have his running be unique to him. All this read option offense will do is keep Cam as an average passer. At least Chud is getting his head back on straight, and cut down the usage of the read option. Yet yall want to embrace it fully. I don't understand it one bit.

i think you're the one not understanding it.

calling it elementary and lumping it with the wildcat? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why would anyone think that Chip Kelly would run "the same" offense in the NFL as college?

He hasn't even really run "the same" offense in college every year. The guy has been great at adapting to the skill of his players and what his opponents are doing, even within a game. That's why it is so hard to shut the Ducks down for 4 quarters.

he doesn't even run the same offense all game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess some of you haven't read theses posts in their entirety. Rayzor posted a link and quote, in the other thread, where Kelly himself, said he'd have to adapt the Offense in the pros. AND that he runs an O that fits his players NOT scheme. AND The Pats use a form of Kellys SPREAD (not option) and his version of the hurry up. But lets just look past that and continue to think hes incapable of adapting or that those techniques, aren't already being used successfully in the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honest question, Rayzor...

What do you see as the main factor(s) that has held back the Oregon teams and kept them from winning it all?

And a follow up question...

Do you think it would be possible to have a Chip Kelly offense coupled with a defense designed to stop traditional NFL offenses? And if so, how would the defense get enough practice time against a traditional offense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we bring in Kelly, I hope he brings in Norv Turner as OC. We kind of run an offense now that is a hybrid of their two systems. Plus, it gives Kelly a lot of experience on the sideline. I don't know how much of a relationship they have, but Oregon is Norv's alma mater, so I'm sure they have at least met.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
    • If Canales has helped Bryce a “poo ton” and this is what we have then what’s the fuging point? And the offense wasn’t humming with Dalton in there either, except against the raiders who’ll likely be firing their coach after this season.  XL is probably the fourth best looking receiving option on the team right now behind thielen, Coker, and sanders. I don’t think anyone would disagree with that. Who cares about total receiving yards when everyone else has missed time and there’s like 180 yards of receiving a game to go around   and lmao they were “believing” shut the fug up. They lost and for the most part those games were all the defense shutting down the other team. The chiefs turned around and gave up an actual impressive stat line to Aiden O’Connell and I not even the most delusional raiders fans think that means anything. Bryce did nothing against the eagles, the Bucs are a mash unit, and any one of us could have done that Bryce did against the giants and saints.  And as far as who they’d get, they didn’t have any trouble hiring the guy you’re tripping over yourself to defend. They also could have hired Dan Quinn, who’s actually succeeding with a young qb.  And people are acting like the risk of getting paid for not working for five years is a negative. Canales is going to spend the next half a decade getting paid to watch porn in his Bible camp office.
    • the Dallas game definitely quelled the hype. his biggest issue will always be his size, and that shows when he gets sacked. he's simply not big or strong enough to protect the ball. even in the KC game, he fumbled it on a basic sack and thank god icky landed on it. INT's are going to happen, most fans don't understand that tipped balls and wrong routes account for most interceptions. but the wet-bar-of-soap type fumbles upon contact are a huge reg flag. the common theme with players like Darnold and Mayfield who previously played for us and are now excelling makes me want to practice patience more when it comes to the QB position. I think Bryce bought himself another season, perhaps with more weapons. I do like the idea of adding a QB whether that's a FA or mid round rookie. if the same mistakes occur next season and we see no further growth or most importantly, wins, then it will be time to move on. just a quick reminder though, football is not an individual sport. QB is just one position, albeit the most important. 
×
×
  • Create New...