Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Intresting Norv Turner comment when asked about being a OC...


PantherTrain84

Recommended Posts

Turner's saying he wants to run his offense. Coaches he knows, means he's familiar, that will want him for that, and not just "oh look I recognize this guy's name."

Dropping Chudzinski is not an option for Rivera. They're tied together, in essence, and Chud hasn't been that bad. Now, the idea of dropping him for Turner would be catastrophic - they're more or less the same in almost every facet, and they have a longer standing association than either do with Rivera. You don't fire one guy to pick up his friend.

More than one team of late has had a "run game coordinator" and a "passing game coordinator" (didn't Fox give McCoy that title?) And of course there's the ever popular "assistant head coach" title as well.

That said, while I wouldn't mind seeing some changes in the assistant lineup (would love to have Juan Castillo, Dave Toub or Bobby April on board) I tend to agree that if Rivera stays, hi staff will likely stay largely intact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fug No!

"This is why I want us to fire Rivera, I don't want to become San Diego of the East."

Personally, I wouldn't mind being the "Chargers of the East." The San Diego Chargers under Norv Turner have done better then the Panthers have the last 5 seasons.

2007: 10-6 playoffs (Carolina 7-9)

2008: 8-8 playoffs (Carolina 12-4)

2009: 13-3 playoffs (Carolina 8-8)

2010: 9-7 (Carolina 2-14)

2011: 8-8 (Carolina 6-10)

Yeah, no way would the Panthers want to bring in someone who actually won 67% of their games over a 5-season stretch and going to the playoffs 3 times in 5 seasons....

Sure 2012 is gong to be bad for the Chargers, but what did you expect when the San Diego Union Tribune publishes an article saying Turner and GM A. J. Smith will both be fired after the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I wouldn't mind being the "Chargers of the East." The San Diego Chargers under Norv Turner have done better then the Panthers have the last 5 seasons.

2007: 10-6 playoffs (Carolina 7-9)

2008: 8-8 playoffs (Carolina 12-4)

2009: 13-3 playoffs (Carolina 8-8)

2010: 9-7 (Carolina 2-14)

2011: 8-8 (Carolina 6-10)

Yeah, no way would the Panthers want to bring in someone who actually won 67% of their games over a 5-season stretch and going to the playoffs 3 times in 5 seasons....

Sure 2012 is gong to be bad for the Chargers, but what did you expect when the San Diego Union Tribune publishes an article saying Turner and GM A. J. Smith will both be fired after the season.

bars not really set too high there.

i don't want to settle for just better than we were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More than one team of late has had a "run game coordinator" and a "passing game coordinator" (didn't Fox give McCoy that title?) And of course there's the ever popular "assistant head coach" title as well.

That said, while I wouldn't mind seeing some changes in the assistant lineup (would love to have Juan Castillo, Dave Toub or Bobby April on board) I tend to agree that if Rivera stays, hi staff will likely stay largely intact.

sure, I dig the split coordinator thing, and it's a way of making something happen. It props up the assistant head coach/experienced coach thing Rivera talked about last week. But Norv's not going to be a position coach and McCoy (or modern equivalent with Steve Wilks) had a position.

Definitely Bobbly April. Toub re-upped, and I don't see Lovie getting fired. I'd really rather not stay with Rodgers. I guess there's always Wannstedt if/when Chan goes (and Belin leaves for college, since he's been decent), but I don't really like Wannstedt much. Castillo would be very good - I still believe Rivera's recommendation may have led Castillo to be promoted, given its proximity to Reid offering up McDermott.

So, I don't know. It'd be interesting, but Norv seems like a longshot, and it's the same offense minus the stuff put in for Cam (which won't change, and doesn't need to change - it just needs less use).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera: HC/DC (McDermott can be an Assistant DC or something...)

Norv: OC

Chud: TE coach/Assistant OC

I can dig it. Obviously it's just a reshuffle of the Chargers coaching staff a few years ago, but that was when the Chargers were top 3 in both offense and defense and only ST kept them from being a dominant team. With the talent we have, that coaching staff can succeed. Bringing in someone like Norv or someone else of a similar experience level to help out is about the only way I'd be ok with Rivera staying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must have missed the first 12 games if the season.

Am I missing something? Is there an Irish folk legend that if you gather enough losers, magical winning happens?

I'm referring to his SD days

No...just so much no...

And once again what is with everyone and fauria? He's 6'7, what else? Nothing, I watched him every Saturday.

Ok...great to hear....

And all I did was mention a tall athletic TE. He's a draft prospect who's been mentioned a lot, who do you want? Regardless, we're just throwing sh*t at the wall but you can continue to be the guy throwing sh*t at the people throwing sh*t :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sure, I dig the split coordinator thing, and it's a way of making something happen. It props up the assistant head coach/experienced coach thing Rivera talked about last week. But Norv's not going to be a position coach and McCoy (or modern equivalent with Steve Wilks) had a position.

Definitely Bobbly April. Toub re-upped, and I don't see Lovie getting fired. I'd really rather not stay with Rodgers. I guess there's always Wannstedt if/when Chan goes (and Belin leaves for college, since he's been decent), but I don't really like Wannstedt much. Castillo would be very good - I still believe Rivera's recommendation may have led Castillo to be promoted, given its proximity to Reid offering up McDermott.

So, I don't know. It'd be interesting, but Norv seems like a longshot, and it's the same offense minus the stuff put in for Cam (which won't change, and doesn't need to change - it just needs less use).

I don't ultimately see Smith getting fired either, though there has been some talk he's on the hot seat.

Given some of Rivera's recent comments (if he's retained) I'm not necessarily betting he'll dump Matsko, but I'd rather have Castillo.

Likewise, he might not bail on is old teammate, but I'd prefer Rodgers go back to being an assistant to someone like Bobby April.

Turner? Like you, I don't think Chudzinski gets his walking papers or gets demoted if Rivera stays. You could make an argument for it but I doubt it happens. But remind me, wasn't Turner a 'consultant' in SF before he got a full time job? Regardless, that's a role I could see him playing.

Truthfully though, I think someone will offer him a full blown OC job. It just might not be us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kurb, I just don't know about that haha

I don't want Rivera here personally but I just think he's retained and I really don't have a problem with it. It's actually kind of a tough decision for the new GM. Ross, Gettleman, Gamble, someone will be coming in and evaluating the situation at hand...it's as much as a toss up imo as there's ever been here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we divide the league up into quarters you need to be able to make 8 worse starting QBs for him not to be bottom tier. Who are they?
    • It just doesn't add up to what we're watching. It feels like you're trying to convince yourself that Bryce can just make a few adjustments and pan out. You say he turns the ball over because he's over aggressive and I just don't see that. A lot of his turnovers are just bad throws oftentimes because the balls sails in him. The fumble issues? I mean, you have the smallest QB in the NFL getting hit by extremely large powerful kej who knows based on film study that this guy is prone to coughing up the ball. If you're being hit by a much larger, much more powerful man intent on removing the ball from your possession you're gonna lose that battle a decent amount of the time. I think some of it is due to bad footwork but some of it is also that when there's traffic in front of him he has to try to get the ball up and over that pressure due to his lack of height. His release point it just several inches lower than most NFL QBs, no way around it. You saying it's more difficult than simply looking at outcomes while completely leaning on situational stats to try to convince people their eyes are lying to them and Bryce's arm isn't a significantly limiting factor in his game. Some people are hyperbolic about his lack of arm strength but honestly he has one of the weakest arms in the league. That's just reality if you objectively watch him play versus other NFL QBs. If he had time in a clean pocket and can step up into and through his throw he can make most throws but that's the problem, for him to make the tougher throws everything has to go perfect. If there's pressure pushing him off his spot or pressure in front of him where he can't step up or has to try to loft the pass over the scrum it's probably ending in a poor result. The problem is that's a commonplace scenario in the NFL. It wasn't at Alabama. Trust your own QB analytical system. Bryce being very the bottom of the league matches up perfectly with the eye test of just watching him olay
    • If he wanted to be as irrelevant as possible in his final year he's achieving it.
×
×
  • Create New...