Legit question. Mark Sanchez or Jimmy Clausen?

[Ken]

How is this a legit question?

[Keith Moons Liver]

For a game tomorrow, Sanchez as he has way more experience. Long term, Clausen. Mostly because I am 100% sure Sanchez is terrible and only 99.9% sure Clausen is terrible.

[Wine&Cheese]

...after what I saw last night, Ill take Jimmy "the pickle" Clausen. Mark Sanchez is the worst QB I have ever seen on any level! I have never seen so many boobs blunders and foillies on a football field by one guy. he was sooo bad I watched the game twice! smh...

[Lemory]

Mark Clausen

[mav1234]

sanchez has a much better td yo int ratio than clausen did. Find a better argument. Clausen was fuging horrid.

So was Sanchez in the regular season, and that was with a pretty damn good Jets team.

[Pimpdaddy]

nother stupid thread. just what we need here. what would you choose? shyt or p!ss...

[MadHatter]

If you HAD to pick? Which one would you and why?

That is like asking if I want kicked in the nuts by a bull or a donkey.

Quite frankly, I vote neither.

[1989]

HAHA! I really don't know.

[footballisasport]

I don't see your point. All I'm saying is Sanchez has showed that he can be a decent QB, taking his team deep into the playoffs twice, but he's on a terrible team with terrible cohesion and terrible coaching right now.

I agree with you 100%.

Sadly there are more decent QBs than really good ones in the NFL..

Cam is above decent but it seems he's being over worked and will eventually be placed on a bench and put in the typical stereotypying mold created for minority QBs like him and Sanchez.

By the way, decent QBs become successfully good QBs when given a fair chance to grow. Such was not the case with Sanchez. The media much rather have their attention placed on a QB like The Golden Calf of Bristol who is more coach created than actually QB talented.