Legit question. Mark Sanchez or Jimmy Clausen?

[footballisasport]

I don't know well Clausen plays but I know Sanchez had one bad season and all of a sudden his football career is over.The media wants him replaced by a QB who claim to fame is that he helped a team win 4 games even thou he only showed up 5 minutes before the end of the game. Even worst, every failure is the teams fault and every win is this QB's.

I knew the Jets was doomed when they got The Golden Calf of Bristol instead of making the ultimate focus building the team around Sanchez.

[footballisasport]

The Sanchize has gotten worse with age. With that said, he plays on one of the most dysfunctional teams in league history. Not really fair for him, if you asked me.

Sanchez is the same age as Matthew. The QB who only good season was last season.

[Cyberjag]

Sanchez plays as poorly in his fourth year as Clausen played as a rookie in a train-wreck of an offense. He's also sucked for two different offensive coordinators that have experienced success with other QBs, while Clausen worked with Jeff Davidson calling plays.

How could you not choose Clausen in that contest? I mean, personal prejudice aside, what has Sanchez shown you that would make you want to go with him over anyone? If I'm in NY, I would be hoping to The Golden Calf of Bristol or McElroy at this point.

[AceMan]

According to some peoples logic we should take Sanchez over Cam. I mean he does have more wins right???? LMAO.

We should prolly trade for Alex Smith too lol

[panthers04100]

Clausen. I think that Clausen is twice the QB that Sanchez is, and I think that Clausen sucks ass.

clausen would never be able to win 4 playoff games like Sanchez did no matter what. Sanchez sucks but jimmy is worse. Clausen threw for 3 fuging touchdowns his rookie year with Steve smith to throw to. Sanchez has 45 touchdowns the past two seasons.

[Seal (SmittyIsOurSavior)]

Sanchez is the same age as Matthew. The QB who only good season was last season.

I don't see your point. All I'm saying is Sanchez has showed that he can be a decent QB, taking his team deep into the playoffs twice, but he's on a terrible team with terrible cohesion and terrible coaching right now.

[Carl Spackler]

clausen would never be able to win 4 playoff games like Sanchez did no matter what. Sanchez sucks but jimmy is worse. Clausen threw for 3 fuging touchdowns his rookie year with Steve smith to throw to. Sanchez has 45 touchdowns the past two seasons.

I'd rather have 0 TD, 0 INT than 1 TD, 4 INT

[panthers04100]

I'd rather have 0 TD, 0 INT than 1 TD, 4 INT

sanchez has a much better td yo int ratio than clausen did. Find a better argument. Clausen was fuging horrid.

[TANTRIC-NINJA]

Sanchez is only a 17 million dollar cap hit in 2013...Good Luck Jets.

[Herbert The Love Bug]

I would go with no QB and just snap it to the RB on every play before I started either one of them. They are equally terrible and will be lucky to find a job in canada or overseas somewhere

[frash.exe]

they're both awful.

although clausen would be more awful, sanchez would cost more

[Riverboat Ron]

VS.

[Mr. Scot]

I'd rather pull Jake Delhomme out of retirement than go with either option.

[CatMan72]

Do I have to pick one?