Legit question. Mark Sanchez or Jimmy Clausen?

[carolina-chuck]

I said it couple years back that Sanchez was only as good as Clausen. Sanchez suck so bad.

I mentioned that if Clausen was put in a situation like Sanchez where the offense was around him that he would be just as good. The jets made that offense simple for him. He had a great OLINE, running game, receivers and a great D. He didn't have to do much. Clausen could've succeed for the Jets two years ago.

Whoever drafting Barkley will be damn dissapointed also. Everytime I look at Matt Barkley, he reminds me so much of Clausen. People talk about how they have an arm and can make all the NFL throws, I just don't see it. Clausen, Sanchez and Barkley all have weak arms.

[Carl Spackler]

Depends on how you want to suck as an offense.

Would you rather have a guy who rarely moves the chains but seldom turns the ball over (Clausen), or a guy who can hit some throws but gives it to the other team more than his own (Sanchez)?

I'd take Clausen. Jimmy can hand off all game and not fumble. Can't say the same for Marky Mark.

[Salvo]

I need to see what Clausen could do in a good offense. Which means...get him the hell off of this team and let him thrive elsewhere.

I've never been impressed with Sanchez but he does have a few playoff wins to his name. However, his offense this year really reminds me of the 2010 Panthers. Whole lotta of ineptitude...

[nctarheel0619]

I need to see what Clausen could do in a good offense. Which means...get him the hell off of this team and let him thrive elsewhere.

I've never been impressed with Sanchez but he does have a few playoff wins to his name. However, his offense this year really reminds me of the 2010 Panthers. Whole lotta of ineptitude...

Not to mention, those two playoff teams had PHENOMENAL defenses and an offense predicated on the run game. I'm not trying to be a douche but a lot of QBs could thrive in that situation.

[Salvo]

Not to mention, those two playoff teams had PHENOMENAL defenses and an offense predicated on the run game. I'm not trying to be a douche but a lot of QBs could thrive in that situation.

Sure, no doubt. That's why I want to see Clausen elsewhere, not here. He has no business in Carolina. Have him go to the Vikings or the Titans. Someplace that could base the running game around him, instead of the other way around.

[Mr. Scot]

This question reminds me of 'death by hunga bunga' :unsure:

[CPF4LIFE]

According to some peoples logic we should take Sanchez over Cam. I mean he does have more wins right???? LMAO.

[LA_Panther]

Sanchez sucks, Clausen blows

[KJ89]

Sanchez sucks, Clausen blows

Vise versa.

[pantheresquire]

Catholics over Trojans

[Harris Aballah]

If you HAD to pick? Which one would you and why?

Pick for what? Hope you ain't talking about football. they have a 3rd string for that. I guess I would let Clausen turn in my dry cleaning? Nah he"d fumble it. Nope, both of em's good for nothing!

[Frizzy350]

Clausen checks down way too often and doesn't really have a big enough arm for the NFL, but he doesn't flat out repeatedly throw away winnable games. I'd much rather have Clausen.

[Seal (SmittyIsOurSavior)]

The Sanchize has gotten worse with age. With that said, he plays on one of the most dysfunctional teams in league history. Not really fair for him, if you asked me.

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

clausen would look borderline serviceable in a west coast offense. he was born to play pitch and catch on slants and hitch routes.