Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pat yas ranking NFC SOUTH RBs


dpanthersman

Recommended Posts

at Green Bay: 25 degrees with 20 mph winds and snow flurries at the end of the game.....Fail

at New York: 20 degrees, unworldy winds.....Fail

Chicago at home: 88+ degrees+Humidity....Fail

and lol at the last part bragging about your back toting the rock 300 plus times. It doesn't concern you at all that your running the legs off your bell cow back in turner and your back up option is Norwood? If it doesn't concern you...the lol at the stupidity coming out of the falcon fan base.

All I'm comparing is what the article says best RB in the division. I don't think we should be running our full time RB so much. Question was who was the best RB in the division to me carries and durability should go into the equation. To me if you're going to be the best RB in the division you need to be a full time RB not a part time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

player A:

4.5 ypc,

1 TD once every 22 carries

20+ yard run once every 34 carries

40+ yard run once every 188 carries

1 fumble every 125 carries

or

player B:

5.5 ypc

1 TD once every 15 carries

20+ yard run once every 18 carries

40+ yard run once every 54 carries

doesn't fumble

both get over 15 carries regularly. who would you most want on your team?

Tuggle seems to have missed this post. In case you haven't figured it out, Tuggle, Player B is Deangelo Williams Player A is your guy Turner.

I see you chose the addendum to base your case for Turner rather than the main post regarding their individual performances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tuggle seems to have missed this post. In case you haven't figured it out, Tuggle, Player B is Deangelo Williams Player A is your guy Turner.

I see you chose the addendum to base your case for Turner rather than the main post regarding their individual performances.

ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tuggle seems to have missed this post. In case you haven't figured it out, Tuggle, Player B is Deangelo Williams Player A is your guy Turner.

I see you chose the addendum to base your case for Turner rather than the main post regarding their individual performances.

I saw the first post it was on page one. This was on page two for you Yoda two comes after one. I saw both posts its nice to see all his info the reason I responded if you'll read my first post is because was saying the only time Turner had a good games was indoors. I guess you missed that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that how good a player is should somewhat be influenced by how large a role he plays on offense. In this case I do give the nod to Turner simple because we have a backup that is on the same level as Turner as a Backup. However I hate to tell you this but I believe the last couple of guys that led the league in attempts had a horrible year the next. Larry Johnson 06 leader, Shaun Alexander 05 leader, Curtis Martin 04, need I go on. Hate to break it to you but the wheels are fixin' to fall off atlanta's burner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at D-Will's 5.5 ypc avg compared to Turner's 4.5 and Peterson's 4.8 with a huge grin. D started off slow last season, but the last 8 games of the season, he was one of the best players in the league, doing that splitting time with Stewart. The Panthers have the perfect formula to be a successful team, barely-competent QB, stout run game, dominated O-line and Smith on the outside makes all those better. Williams ran the ball roughly 100 times less than both the two leading rushers in the league, thanks to all our offensive weapons. Turner I think is slightly better, but Williams this year hopefully will surpass all of them, and the 0 fumbles compared to 9 and 3 is something that doesn't often get mentioned, especially nationally amongst the talkn heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the first post it was on page one. This was on page two for you Yoda two comes after one. I saw both posts its nice to see all his info the reason I responded if you'll read my first post is because was saying the only time Turner had a good games was indoors. I guess you missed that.

tuggle I know Disinformation Tactics when I see them. You just used the "Straw Man Technique" where you emphasize the weaker part of an opponents argument, dispute it then claim to have won the argument.

No such luck Tuggle, we know what we have in Deangelo and Stewart. While you guys are burning up Turner to get Ryan off the Ground. A sacrifice play. We'll see how it works out soon enough . . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SC won the ACC title the week before in Clemsons own house. Committee was worried about optics over talent. 
    • It's crazy how folks on the huddle can draft better than our highly paid scouts.  I know I saw several mocks with the first 3 selections going Ladd, Frazier and Wilson like the above post.  Heck, one of them may have been mine.  It seems that the scouts go into paralysis by analysis.  Ladd might not be the ideal weight or height, it's tabo to draft centers high, Wilson had past injuries.  All that said, those dudes just dominated at their respective positions. Our scouting department and Morgan need the K.I.S.S montra--keep it simple stupid. STOP overthinking it.
    • This team has long had an allergy to the obvious pick. They take an XL and think they can coach him up to be the next megaton or DK. Brooks to be the next Peterson. Burns to be the next LT. They pick dudes and play them outside of their natural position. They draft for need, get desperate, pick the flawed guy, and the results speak for themselves. They go to the store jonesing for a ribeye, the store is sold out except for the ‘manager’s special’ … and end up with a toilet of puke later that night…  whereas the filet that was sitting right next to it got some other dude laid.  The obvious pick with no need of coaching up has done them pretty well. Moose. Peppers. Kuechly. Davis. Gross. Jenkins, etc.  Sometimes obvious is just obvious. Consistently missing on first and second rounders gets them exactly where they are. Loser teams, devoid of talent and a revolving door at head coach.  WR: Pick the guy who can catch the damn ball. DE: pick the guy who can play the run well. Pass rush is nice, but playing the run is better.  center: smart big guy who doesn’t miss assignments.  tackle: good pass protector first. Run blocker second. If you have a really good QB and receivers that can catch, the running game will open itself up by default.    It’s not THAT hard, right? Diamonds in the rough are usually only quartz. Stop picking up dudes whose flaw is THE primary skill required for their position, thinking that you’ve got some sort of magical staff. Go BPA with the healthy guy who just flat out gets it done better than anyone else still available…. Except for a RB or special teamer. Yes BPA is boring, but it stacks the team with legit talent.    That’s what I’m going to call their reaches from now on. The f-in manager’s special. Break out the cast iron griddle, Montreal steak seasoning, and some avocado oil. 
×
×
  • Create New...