Anyone else intrigued by DE/LB/S/TE Dion Jordan?

[carolina-chuck]

You're lost man, and just looking for something to talk poo about.

Jarvis jones and dion Jordan are nothing a like.

Jones is 6-3 240 and Jordan is 6-7 250, with A LOT more muscle to add.

Jones is strictly an OLB where Jordan can play whatever te fug he wants and excel, he's that good.

Nowhere in my post did I say we should draft him and switch to a 3/4 like all the kids say we should with jones or Te'o.

And yeah, him and Aldon are a lot alike but Jordan is bigger. If you watch Aldon smith, he gets a lot of sacks lined up as a normal DE with his hand on the ground.

We could do some awesome blitz packages with this guy. But once again you have the completely wrong idea of what I'm trying to say.

"Now I'm not the kinda guy that forgets we run a 4/3 and says we should draft a rush LB like Jarvis jones or manti te'o"

You say youre not like some who doesn't remember that we're a 43 D. Why then later in your post, talk about a potential 34 D prospect?

[Bwood]

"Now I'm not the kinda guy that forgets we run a 4/3 and says we should draft a rush LB like Jarvis jones or manti te'o"

You say youre not like some who doesn't remember that we're a 43 D. Why then later in your post, talk about a potential 34 D prospect?

Chuck man straight up are you really this dumb or are you just a bad troll??

I said he's a 3-4 DE/OLB prospect but can play anywhere and we could line him up at 4-3 DE and in 3-4 OLB situations like we do with applewhite.

He is not like any other prospect, jones can't play DE and OLB. Jordan can do whatevs he wants because he is a freak.

What don't you fugging get?

[carolina-chuck]

Chuck man straight up are you really this dumb or are you just a bad troll??

I said he's a 3-4 DE/OLB prospect but can play anywhere and we could line him up at 4-3 DE and in 3-4 OLB situations like we do with applewhite.

He is not like any other prospect, jones can't play DE and OLB. Jordan can do whatevs he wants because he is a freak.

What don't you fugging get?

What you mean by this "Now I'm not the kinda guy that forgets we run a 4/3 and says we should draft a rush LB like Jarvis jones or manti te'o"?

[JawnyBlaze]

For us, hell no. In general, for some other team, sure why not.

[Bwood]

What you mean by this "Now I'm not the kinda guy that forgets we run a 4/3 and says we should draft a rush LB like Jarvis jones or manti te'o"?

What don't you understand about that??

I'm not the kinda guy that says we should draft some linebacker like jones or an inside backer like Te'o and switch to a 3/4, but Jordan (who plays as DE/OLB) might just be talented and versatile enough to warrant a pick. He would find a home in our 4/3 defense no matter what.

[ZackAttack23]

Better than Clowney? Ummm what?

[DaCityKats]

Better than Clowney? Ummm what?

west coast biased.

[GAme]

I like what you're saying, but he's not even close to Clowney

[carolina-chuck]

What don't you understand about that??

I'm not the kinda guy that says we should draft some linebacker like jones or an inside backer like Te'o and switch to a 3/4, but Jordan (who plays as DE/OLB) might just be talented and versatile enough to warrant a pick. He would find a home in our 4/3 defense no matter what.

Jarvis could still play in a 43 D and possibly be taken by a 43 D like Cleveland. He could really find a home in a 43. Jarvis isnt just a rushing LB. He plays the run fairley well and is pretty damn good in coverage.

For Manti, I may just be blind or something but I haven't seen anyone post anything up about taking a Manti. Say if we were going to a 34, we have Beason and Kuechly. Dont think anyone have mentioned the name Manti.

Couldve been a better thread if you didn't try bashing the people who thinks a 34 is a possibility next season, and didn't compare him to Clowney.

[Bwood]

Jarvis could still play in a 43 D and possibly be taken by a 43 D like Cleveland. He could really find a home in a 43. Jarvis isnt just a rushing LB. He plays the run fairley well and is pretty damn good in coverage.

For Manti, I may just be blind or something but I haven't seen anyone post anything up about taking a Manti. Say if we were going to a 34, we have Beason and Kuechly. Dont think anyone have mentioned the name Manti.

Couldve been a better thread if you didn't try bashing the people who thinks a 34 is a possibility next season, and didn't compare him to Clowney.

Anyone that thinks we would draft Jarvis or Te'o is fugging nuts. Period. That isn't bashing. We are not taking another linebacker in top ten an switching our defense that even with injuries has been pretty solid.

Clowney is the only prospect that I can think of that compares to him due to size and athleticism.

Both will be incredible pass rushers at the next level, but I'll take the praying mantis.

[Ruff]

I think I'd rather have Jackson Jeffcoat.

[La Pantera]

Jarvis could still play in a 43 D and possibly be taken by a 43 D like Cleveland. He could really find a home in a 43. Jarvis isnt just a rushing LB. He plays the run fairley well and is pretty damn good in coverage.

For Manti, I may just be blind or something but I haven't seen anyone post anything up about taking a Manti. Say if we were going to a 34, we have Beason and Kuechly. Dont think anyone have mentioned the name Manti.

Couldve been a better thread if you didn't try bashing the people who thinks a 34 is a possibility next season, and didn't compare him to Clowney.

Jarvis Jones is a helluva passrusher, but he is garbage against the run. Most teams ran the ball right at him. He could be a passrushing specialist at DE, but no way hes a 4 down DE.

[carolina-chuck]

Jarvis Jones is a helluva passrusher, but he is garbage against the run. Most teams ran the ball right at him. He could be a passrushing specialist at DE, but no way hes a 4 down DE.

I think he plays the run decently. I didnt say he was great at it.

[Jackofalltrades]

Physically he reminds me of JPP.