Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers should go after Tony Dungy


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

Overrated coach. Couldn't get it done in Tampa Bay & rode Peyton Manning's coat tail in Indy.

Tony Dungy, by all accounts, is an amazing individual & great man. But he's overrated as a coach.

I don't know about all accounts; let's ask James Dungy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This post is laughable. Tell me Peyton's record in the playoffs in Indy before Tony was his coach. Jets used to kick Peyton's ass every year! What was Tampa's record the previous years before he came down there?

0-1

You're arguing a 2nd year QB got beat in the playoffs?!?!?! GASP!!!!!!

What is Cam's playoff record thru 2 years?

,.............

Now, you tell me what Tampa Bay's playoff record was after they got a real coach. Pretty sure they won the Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0-1

You're arguing a 2nd year QB got beat in the playoffs?!?!?! GASP!!!!!!

What is Cam's playoff record thru 2 years?

,.............

Now, you tell me what Tampa Bay's playoff record was after they got a real coach. Pretty sure they won the Super Bowl.

Both coaches won superbowls but only one gave thanks after winning the superbowl to the former coach who built the defense which got him there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will pass

I worry about coaches who have been away from the game. I think they are at risk of losing touch with the sport and may not be as willing to put in the needed hours like they previously did.

I think that he is a great manager of men (which we need), but I am just not a fan of those who has been away from the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know how many times I have to tell you boobs this, but Carolina will NEVER hire a former high profile Coach, thanks in large part to the Seifert disaster. So get over it you Clowns.

Dungy - not coming here (or anywhere else) - Get over it

Cowher - not coming here - Get over it

Reid - not coming here - Get over it

Holmgren - not coming here - Get over it

Gruden - not coming here - Get over it.

We've done "the former great" and the "successful coordinator" route - This time it will be a College Coach. Someone NOT named Chip Kelly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know how many times I have to tell you boobs this, but Carolina will NEVER hire a former high profile Coach, thanks in large part to the Seifert disaster. So get over it you Clowns.

Dungy - not coming here (or anywhere else) - Get over it

Cowher - not coming here - Get over it

Reid - not coming here - Get over it

Holmgren - not coming here - Get over it

Gruden - not coming here - Get over it.

We've done "the former great" and the "successful coordinator" route - This time it will be a College Coach. Someone NOT named Chip Kelly.

Awesome... So did you get this straight from JR? Or our new GM whomever that may be? Cause the way you stated that made it seem like that is a 100% factual statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both coaches won superbowls but only one gave thanks after winning the superbowl to the former coach who built the defense which got him there.

lmao...

it's the NFL not pee-wee...

Dungy lucked out & got to coach the greatest QB in NFL history. Otherwise he would be the guy who faded into oblivion while his replacement won a Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...