Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most desirable HC Spots Next Yr


Peppers90 NC

Recommended Posts

We, along with other team will be looking for a new coach. The competition for top level coaches will be tough. I am listing the teams off the top of my head that will probably be looking for a new coach next year. Where, as far as desirability, do we fall in line?

-Panthers

-Eagles

-Browns

-Bills

-Raiders

-Chargers

-Cowboys

I would say at least 4 of these 7 will be ditching their coaches for anew. Does Cam and this defense along with the city of Charlotte seem desirable for head coaching prospects? Or will be stuck with a plan B or C?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do not want.

Why? Are you like everyone else that doesn't want Chip because they think he will run the same exact offense he did at Oregon?

LOL yeah an offensive genius such as Kelly wouldn't come up with a whole new scheme that would be successful in the NFL.

"GIVE ME MOAR EX DEFENSIVE CARDINATERS!!!1"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chargers, Carolina, Eagles, Cowboys, Bills, Raiders, Browns.

Chargers:

Pros:

  • Great QB to build a scheme and team around.
  • Solid Fan Base.
  • Location.
  • Will give a coach plenty of time to get a team going see norv turner.
  • Cheerleaders
  • Weak Division

Negatives

  • Current GM has destoyed the roster
  • QB is a bit of hot head

Panthers

Pros:

  • Young talented QB to build a scheme and team around.
  • Solid Talent on current roster to go the next level

Negs:

  • Inconsistant fan base.
  • Next years Salaries could be issues.
  • QB leadership quailities in question.
  • Competive Division

Eagles

Pros

  • Huge market exposer team.
  • Dedicated ownership
  • NFL team with a solid legacy
  • Will receive pleny of time to get the job done see Andy Reid

Cons:

  • Talent is hurting.
  • Overpaid players in certain postions
  • Veteran Roster, tough to get to buy into a new system.
  • Fans could actually Kill you.
  • Competive Division

I could keep going, but bogged at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Are you like everyone else that doesn't want Chip because they think he will run the same exact offense he did at Oregon?

LOL yeah an offensive genius such as Kelly wouldn't come up with a whole new scheme that would be successful in the NFL.

"GIVE ME MOAR EX DEFENSIVE CARDINATERS!!!1"

MEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, if Garret gets shitcanned, then the Cowboys are the most desirable HC spot, just because of their popularity. Then I'd say it's a toss up between us, the Eagles and the Chargers in terms of a mix of prestige of the franchise and talent of the roster, with us having maybe a slight edge because our QB is young and we have a bright future with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...