Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game 11: Bobcats vs Hawks

HeatCheck

By HeatCheck,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Yes but you can't state your facts and then say don't think about Aldridge and Batum. It completely kills your entire argument.

Take this game for example. Mullens hits maybe 1 of his 3 pointers and 3 of the layups he missed, Bobcats probably win the game and Kemba has a double double. I would say 16pts 12ast. Very good stat line for a PG. Which means like it has for a very long time if you follow the Bobcats we need a legit 4 or 5 asap.

Doesn't kill my argument a bit if I knew thats what going to come out of your mouth. And you know it too that you were going to use Batum and Alridge as your come back.

Sure maybe Kemba could've have 12 assts if Mullens made his shots but those weren't shots or plays set up by Kemba. Mullens choose to take those shots like always.

You're missing my point. Kemba and sessions doesn't control this offense. They're just shooters. And we can and have win a lot of games with that but great teams that will make it far have a PG who controls the offense and create opportunity for everyone around them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

The problem with Kemba is he is too small to be a shooting guard, he might be able to play defense against a shooting guard (because of his quickness), but Kemba would not do well against a taller cover.

I will also say this, Kemba and Ramon take much better care of the ball than those passing point guards. Almost all of the starting point guards in the league average more turnovers than Kemba and Ramon.

I agreed he's too small. Hes a SG in a PG body. Its like you forcing Ben Gordon to play PG. You'll get the same outcome if Gordon was playing PG.

But you cant compared the turnovers average with other PGs in this league. Ofcourse they're going to turn the ball over more wen they passes more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Our offense isn't set up for typical point guards. We run a college offense where you get up and get down. You only need speedy point guards who can finish to run our offense and really those are the kind that are being bred to play in the NBA nowadays.

Why are we running a college offense? bc we dont have a pure passing PG who can pick apart the defense. All of yall are not getting it. Yall keep bringin up that we dont have the personnel or the systems for a Rubio, Nash or Rondo succeed. Trust me if we have one of them, they'll make Dunlap's life a lot more simpler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eazy-E Mentor

Eazy-E

Posted
Posted

Doesn't kill my argument a bit if I knew thats what going to come out of your mouth. And you know it too that you were going to use Batum and Alridge as your come back.

Sure maybe Kemba could've have 12 assts if Mullens made his shots but those weren't shots or plays set up by Kemba. Mullens choose to take those shots like always.

You're missing my point. Kemba and sessions doesn't control this offense. They're just shooters. And we can and have win a lot of games with that but great teams that will make it far have a PG who controls the offense and create opportunity for everyone around them.

Any sane person is going to say that because a PGs numbers will always look good when they are dishing the ball to All Star caliber players. And the fact that you knew I was going to say it just validates what I am saying even more and continues to kill the points you are trying to make.

Also you are proving to not know basketball if you think the screen and rolls Kemba and Mullens were running were not designed plays. They may have not been drawn out by the coach on the side line during a time out but I can guarantee they run it plenty in practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeatCheck Newbie

HeatCheck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It works both ways though. Part of that is based on how our team is assembled. I am not saying Kemba or Sessions is some master-distributor but their assist numbers will go up when a competent offense is built around them. But for now, they have to take on a good portion of the scoring load.

This team can win if we strengthen our front court even with Kemba and Sessions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Build the team around Kemba, Sessions, MKG, Taylor, and Hendo.

Don't rely on drafting a "true" PG that will set us back a year to build around.

Not really.

Going to the Pau Gasol talk that a huddler created (Im opposed to it), but in a case like:

-Draft Kabongo

-Trade Kemba, Mullens, Gordon for Pau Gasol

I think we'll be much better off with a lineup of: Sessions/Kabongo, Taylor/ Hendo, MKG, Gasol, Haywood.

Sessions controls and manage the game better than Kemba and I love Kemba

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Anybodyhome
      First Goal Game 2024!!!

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      I'm going with Robinson tonight.
    • panthers81
      First Goal Game 2024!!!

      By panthers81 · Posted

      Ghost tonight! 
    • d-dave
      Bryce Young vs Saints analysis

      By d-dave · Posted

      I've watched and listened to several evaluations from the good ole youtubers.  From what I was able to watch, the first few drives before I left to do a job to the end of the game were very different for Bryce.  So he had a "good" game.  Which is great.  I love a win, period.  His WRs had some drops, thing ripped away, etc.  Not great, but a W is a W, right? I think the Panthers have to start Bryce.  You have to see if he continues to build on the good plays and make fewer and fewer bad plays.  No QB is going to play a perfect game.  But we need to continue to see Bryce make plays.  Does he have the ability to will his team to victory?  I'm not sure. I'm still in the Bryce is a backup QB camp.  I'm glad he had a good game, I glad we won, but I need to see more before we make a decision to keep or trade him.  Playing Andy literally does NOTHING to help you for the future.  Andy may not even resign with the Panthers.  We could be out both starting QBs by the time FA/Draft season hits. Ultimately, this is a Dan Morgan and Dave Canales issue.  Can they get value out of Bryce to help them improve the total roster?  Is there a FA QB who would be an upgrade?  A surprise cut or post season trade?  Or is there a QB at the top of the draft who they think they can mold into a high level starting QB?  I don't know. I do know I want to see more of Bryce Young and more out of him on the field.  I want to see the fire, the competitor come out.  I want him getting pissed.  I want him to grab his beanbag and tell us all he's the f'ing dude.  I just don't think we'll see that out of Bryce.  If not the fire, then let me see the ice - let me see the rattle proof dude who kills with accuracy and playmaking no matter how hot and crazy it gets.
×
×
  • Create New...