Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bismack Biyombo Appreciation Thread


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

Rebounds per 48 isn't a terrible stat, but I much prefer rebound rate.

Rebound Rate puts Adrian as the best rebounder on the Bobcats at 16, with Bizmack 2nd at 15.4.

Coupled with the fact that he leads the team in both rebounds and RB/48 and is second in rate. I'd say it's easy to say he's the Bobcats best rebounder.

For reference Haywood is at 14 RBR. MKG is at 12.7 RBR and Mullens is at 14.6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rebound Rate puts Adrian as the best rebounder on the Bobcats at 16, with Bizmack 2nd at 15.4.

Coupled with the fact that he leads the team in both rebounds and RB/48 and is second in rate. I'd say it's easy to say he's the Bobcats best rebounder.

Bismack has become our best all around rebounder, but that's because he has a pretty good offensive rebound rate coupled with an average defensive rebound rate. He really needs to hit the defensive boards much harder and he has the potential to be a very good defensive rebounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bismack has become our best all around rebounder, but that's because he has a pretty good offensive rebound rate coupled with an average defensive rebound rate. He really needs to hit the defensive boards much harder and he has the potential to be a very good defensive rebounder.

Haywood, and Adrian both have higher Offensive Rebound rates.

Haywood at 12.4, Adrian at 11.1 with Bizmack at 10.3

Mullens is the best DRBR at 23.5, Adrian at second with 21.1 and Bizmack at 20.7.

So he's the third best DRBR on the team and the 3rd best ORBR. Neither of them being all that good overall. Bobcat fans have to keep in mind that he's only 20, he's in his second year and he's only been playing basketball for a couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haywood, and Adrian both have higher Offensive Rebound rates.

Haywood at 12.4, Adrian at 11.1 with Bizmack at 10.3

Mullens is the best DRBR at 23.5, Adrian at second with 21.1 and Bizmack at 20.7.

So he's the third best DRBR on the team and the 3rd best ORBR. Neither of them being all that good overall. Bobcat fans have to keep in mind that he's only 20, he's in his second year and he's only been playing basketball for a couple of years.

Trust me I know that stats lol.

That's why I said he's probably the best overall rebounder on the team, although you can also make an argument for Adrien.

I still believe in the potential that Biz has, but man he's so below average as a starter... the kids APER is 9.61 which is basically bench warmer level. Obviously APER (and especially PER) isn't the only stat that you should use to judge a player, but it does provide a good guideline to guage what kind of overall impact a player makes. Again, I do believe in his potential and I think that he'll at the very least get to role player status, although I'd like to see him get to starter level obviously (and I think that he can do it as he gains experience).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...