Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

beason and harris on DEF scheme


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Thought this was a pretty interesting quote from Beason and Harris on the defense

were duly diligent in studying the new scheme implemented by defensive coordinator Ron Meeks, but found that knowing their tasks and terminology was different than putting it into practice.

"We can go into meetings and do all the chalk talk we want," Beason said. "But being out here (on the field) is the only way you're going to get better."

Even if it was a little like starting from scratch.

"I kind of feel like a rookie all over again," Beason said. "But obviously the pressure isn't there, so the transition's going to be easy. The terminology is different, but it's all the same stuff; cover-three is cover-three everywhere.

Added Harris: "This is kind of (similar) to the scheme we ran in Chicago when I was there, so I don't have that big of a learning curve."

so what kind of scheme did they run in chicago..then..

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-1/masons-minutes-school-begins-with-harris-beason-back-on-field/0e52f3a3-9cfe-4eaa-a1d6-adcb51917853

more stuff in the OTA thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought this was a pretty interesting quote from Beason and Harris on the defense

so what kind of scheme did they run in chicago..then..

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-1/masons-minutes-school-begins-with-harris-beason-back-on-field/0e52f3a3-9cfe-4eaa-a1d6-adcb51917853

more stuff in the OTA thread

Who cares, Fox not only controls the defense AND offense of the Panthers.. He controls the Chicago playbooks as well. It's all the same, we will end up 6-10.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope that, given the similarities to Chicago's defense, Harris gets back to forcing fumbles like he was in 2007.

I think much of his dropoff in production can be attributed to playing with a rookie safety and with little pressure from the front four.

Meeks is known for playing to his players strengths. I hope our secondary improves the to point Meeks can just tell Harris to knock the hell out of whomever has the ball.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth is every team for the most part plays zone pass defense most of the time. Whether it is cover 1, cover 2, cover 3, cover 8 or whatever isn't the issue. It is how you execute the scheme and whether you are an aggressive defense or more passive that makes the difference.

Trgo's defense was a bend don't break give up everything underneath type of defense. Meeks seems to be more of a high energy go the ball type of defense. That is very similar to Chicago.

I for one like the aggressive high energy defense best. It may not be my favorite which is the Jim Johnson blitzing attack, but hopefully it is better than the passive predictable defense of Trgo's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LMAO! You guys are living in a dream world. The defense is going to be completely the same as it was before. There will be no difference between the scheme that Trgo ran from the one Meeks runs. Sure they may "tweak" a few things but as someone already pointed out John Fox is the man running the defense not meeks. The coordinators are nothing more than just puppets!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cover 8

So...rush three, have eight not really knowing what they are doing except prevent the ball from getting into an opposing set of hands?

For some reason, I can only compare this to sychronized swimming performed by retarded midgets. It's effective for what it's trying to do, but damn it looks dumb.

Nice quote, by the way, sc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...rush three, have eight not really knowing what they are doing except prevent the ball from getting into an opposing set of hands?

For some reason, I can only compare this to sychronized swimming performed by retarded midgets. It's effective for what it's trying to do, but damn it looks dumb.

Nice quote, by the way, sc.

Didnt the Patriots run a cover 9 before???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth is every team for the most part plays zone pass defense most of the time. Whether it is cover 1, cover 2, cover 3, cover 8 or whatever isn't the issue. It is how you execute the scheme and whether you are an aggressive defense or more passive that makes the difference.

Trgo's defense was a bend don't break give up everything underneath type of defense. Meeks seems to be more of a high energy go the ball type of defense. That is very similar to Chicago.

I for one like the aggressive high energy defense best. It may not be my favorite which is the Jim Johnson blitzing attack, but hopefully it is better than the passive predictable defense of Trgo's.

i agree with this.

it's just a difference between being passive and aggressive. with passive everything is geared around just containing the threat and trgo came up with all kinds of ways to plug holes that would inevitably pop up. he tried to plan for every possible hole which led to things getting pretty complicated.

with meeks aggressive defense everything is going to be geared towards attacking the ball and who has it or is supposed to get it. the way it sounds it is going to rely on people using their instincts rather than a complicated playbook. it won't be man to man but there are going to be elements of it (there has to be for the cover 2/3 to be effective). other than sanders, meeks, and mathis, i don't know that he had all that an aggressive and hard hitting team to work with. here he has a lot of fast moving, hard hitting players so the results should be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LMAO! You guys are living in a dream world. The defense is going to be completely the same as it was before. There will be no difference between the scheme that Trgo ran from the one Meeks runs. Sure they may "tweak" a few things but as someone already pointed out John Fox is the man running the defense not meeks. The coordinators are nothing more than just puppets!

ohhhhh ok it all makes sense now! like i used to think that you were kind of an idiot, but now that i understand the intracacies of football i'll be sure and send you an apology card and a case of wine, just PM me the address. i can't understand your plethora of neg rep at all... :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with this.

it's just a difference between being passive and aggressive. with passive everything is geared around just containing the threat and trgo came up with all kinds of ways to plug holes that would inevitably pop up. he tried to plan for every possible hole which led to things getting pretty complicated.

with meeks aggressive defense everything is going to be geared towards attacking the ball and who has it or is supposed to get it. the way it sounds it is going to rely on people using their instincts rather than a complicated playbook. it won't be man to man but there are going to be elements of it (there has to be for the cover 2/3 to be effective). other than sanders, meeks, and mathis, i don't know that he had all that an aggressive and hard hitting team to work with. here he has a lot of fast moving, hard hitting players so the results should be better.

for a long time, our fanbase has been desiring a mean, nasty, attitudinal defense... the meeks philosophy seems to be much better suited for such a reputation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with this.

it's just a difference between being passive and aggressive. with passive everything is geared around just containing the threat and trgo came up with all kinds of ways to plug holes that would inevitably pop up. he tried to plan for every possible hole which led to things getting pretty complicated.

with meeks aggressive defense everything is going to be geared towards attacking the ball and who has it or is supposed to get it. the way it sounds it is going to rely on people using their instincts rather than a complicated playbook. it won't be man to man but there are going to be elements of it (there has to be for the cover 2/3 to be effective). other than sanders, meeks, and mathis, i don't know that he had all that an aggressive and hard hitting team to work with. here he has a lot of fast moving, hard hitting players so the results should be better.

Teams that attack the ball that come to mind are Tampa bay,Chicago, and Philly. I love that style of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You have a weird understanding between what is an opinion and what is a fact.  I suspect its lack of intelligence but feel free to straighten that out for us.
    • KOC has had his guys outperforming expectations every year on the job.  He's a very very good coach. Darnold also stopped making the "Darnold" mistakes.  He's really grown with that offense, JJ/Addison and the playcalling aside.   And that defense with Metellus, Murphy, Greenard, & VG has been strong.   They're a team I wouldn't mind seeing make a run.  Fun offense, fun defense, great coaching, on the up and up.   
    • I enjoy some of the article on the score, and their game casts aren't bad, either if you're trying to catch a score when you're out somewhere... https://www.thescore.com/nhl/news/3165975/the-all-nobody-team-6-nhlers-quickly-becoming-somebodies Jackson Blake, Hurricanes, F Icon Sportswire / Getty Images One way to decipher how serious a team is about winning is to peruse its list of rookies. How many have appeared in at least one game? Any full-timers? Edmonton is the only team without a single rookie on the books this season. Four other clubs, including Carolina, have dressed just one. The Hurricanes are firmly in contention mode and look every bit like a legitimate Stanley Cup threat in 2024-25. Blake, a 21-year-old all-around winger, is their lone youngster, essentially the kid brother in a dressing room filled with veterans. It's a fitting dynamic for someone who frequented players-only spaces as a boy (his dad, Jason Blake, played in the NHL from 1998 to 2012). The younger Blake has suited up for all 38 Canes games, pitching in eight goals and four assists despite logging only 11:38 a night. Carolina has outscored the opposition 13-10 in his 360 five-on-five minutes - no small feat for an unheralded rookie. Star forward Marty Necas leads the team with five game-winning goals; Blake is second with four. Here's a clip of the University of North Dakota product unleashing a lethal wrist shot for the eventual winner back on Nov. 27: Blake possesses silky hands. However, what's really endeared him to head coach Rod Brind'Amour is his non-stop motor and 200-foot sensibilities. This tenacious brand of hockey has blended well with the Hurricanes' patented style and led to a ton of penalties - 13 drawn and 10 taken, which rank first and fifth, respectively, among NHL rookies. Surely, Brind'Amour would love it if those numbers were more lopsided in the direction of "drawn." Blake made his NHL debut last year in the Canes' final regular-season game. It allowed the Hobey Baker Award finalist to get a feel for the pros and also burn a year off his entry-level contract. He's a restricted free agent in 2026.
×
×
  • Create New...