Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Changes needed on offense


SpeedOFLight

Recommended Posts

This is my take on what I think should be changed on offense. Number 1, lets get Greg involved more. I remember Rivera saying that Greg could put up graham type numbers. How about make a lot of the offense through him then?

Quicker/shorter routes maybe? Some of the plays take way too long to develop. I watch how the Patriots let Brady dink and dunk then hit the homerun play when available. This for one chews up the clock and keeps the QB in rhythm.

Run the ball. This is a QB best friend. I don't think we have one rusher with over 100 yards in a game yet. We need to get our backfield more reps to take the pressure off our QB.

Also as a side note, I would like I see more interaction on the sideline from all players and coaches. I'm only watching from home so I don't see the whole picture but I never see the players talking and going over the game. Where are the coaches showing cam photos of the defense or the linemen getting together. Maybe zod, you can tell more of what's going on but on camera it looks very weird. I'm not an expert but just a fan who loves Carolina football so take what I say with a grain of salt. Sorry if the text format came out weird, I'm doing this post from my iPhone. Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't pay 2 RBs a combined $14M a year and get that kind of crap production out of them. Combined if they are not getting at least 100 yards and 4 yards a carry they are not doing their jobs.

Right now they are getting 50 yards a game with a combined 3.6 a carry pathetic.

And why Deangelo williams gets elite money i have no idea. He does little to help the team win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole scheme needs a make over and it needs to complement our personnel. Right now it's not...we are stuck in shotgun deep mode when we should be run first , play action...intermediate. Not going for the 20+yd pass every play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't pay 2 RBs a combined $14M a year and get that kind of crap production out of them. Combined if they are not getting at least 100 yards and 4 yards a carry they are not doing their jobs.

Right now they are getting 50 yards a game with a combined 3.6 a carry pathetic.

And why Deangelo williams gets elite money i have no idea. He does little to help the team win.

true but old news. move forward

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...