Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bruce Arians is 5-1 as an interim head coach


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

No guarantee Pagano ever comes back. Its' cancer. Arians has always been a really good offensive mind. Great with the Browns in 2001-2002. Just a winner. Has the balls to take shots, total opposite of Ron who constantly tries to back into wins.

Biggest thing Colts have going for them other than Luck is they're playing with house money, no pressure. They know they're not supposed to be here and they're taking shots every week with reckless abandon. They're fun and good for the NFL. Love Reggie Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, our coach can't even outsmart coaches of other bad teams

Yea I'm somewhat agree with you on that part. I don't really like Chico as much as you do. Just saying the Colts are not as great as the record say they are.

And I rather have someone else than Arians. Their wins may have to do with players playing hard for Chuck Pagano or it could just be they're playin against weak teams. Well find out if they're that good when they meet twice with the Texans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's make a thread about other coaches to make Rivera look worse! Great Idea man. Glad you thought of it.

Rivera has the rest of the season to improve this team or himself.

If I wanted to make Rivera look bad believe me there are much less time consuming things to do than create a thread in 3 minutes highlighting Bruce Arians

really all you have to do is mention his .333 winning percentage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There wasn't a moment of the day that I couldn't at least hear helicopters.
    • Spoken like someone who hasn't watched nearly enough of T-Mac other than a few short highlight clips to know his game. The only thing he doesn't have is the short area quickness in the way that you're looking for, as you seem to want that Jefferson/Chase type of WR, which sure, he's not that. But him and XL are nothing alike, let alone having the same strengths and weaknesses.  In particular, T-Mac's #1 strength is LITERALLY XL's #1 weakness, their hands.  T-Mac has vice grips for hands, catches darn near everything, and does it all with hands catches, the opposite of XL.   Beyond that, you mention prioritizing route running, of which, T-Mac already runs a complete NFL route tree at a high level.  Yes, he needs to work on his get off the line at the snap and get a little crisper on some of his cuts to create separation, but again, all players need to work on something, that's just what his is.  It doesn't change that he is already a great route runner, there are just some small elements of it that he can improve on. Even then, it's like I've been saying, the trade off of not having that true elite separation like the smaller WR's get, is how good he is at using his body to keep the DB's from being able to break up passes and just making contested catches in general.  You lose a little bit of separation, but his 6'5" body gives him advantages that the smaller WRs just don't have. Again, your post here insinuates that T-Mac is a slow, plodding big WR who isn't a proficient route runner, which couldn't be further from the truth.  I have no issue with people wanting other players over T-Mac, or just not wanting him at all.  But they need to be logical reasons, not made up ones in your head because you don't actually know the player and his abilities.
    • I'm pretty sure that was the best season he's ever gonna have.  
×
×
  • Create New...