Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What kind of candy did you get?


LifeisaGarden

Recommended Posts

What did you get to give to the little demons?

I usually give out good stuff and make awesome little goody bags but last year I got looted so this year I'm giving them poo ass candy and a note on the door calling out the little fuggers. While I take my kid around the hood, I am going to carry good candy around with me and give it out to the little kids.

For poo ass candy I got, dum dum pops , candy corn and that chewy taffy candy that always sticks to the paper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Super_Freak

This year, sixlets. I loved them as a kid so i bought a big ol' bag to hand out. Hopefully, i'll have a lot leftover :)

sixlets_bulk_candy.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One year, we had Smarties and DumDums, and we gave the kids a question. Get it right, get Smarties and another question. Get it wrong, you get a DumDum as a lovely parting gift.

This year we have KitKats, Fruit Rollups, and Gushers. We had a bag of fun size Reese Cups, but they (and a good quantity of liquor) disappeared one night last week. Weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...