Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which of these players should be cut if unwilling to restructure?

panther4life

By panther4life,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

http://www.spotrac.c...olina-panthers/

When I list the dead money, I am referring to the remaining signing bonuses that will hit the cap. You can take the hit all in 1 year or spread it over 2 if you desginate them a june 1st cut.I don't personally condone cutting all of these guys but heres our highest paid players and their scheduled cap hits and how much it would cost to cut them(dead money)

To understand the net cap hit of cutting each indvidual take their total cap hit - minus the dead money. You can spread it over 2 years(thanks rocknrolla) but whatever number you see listed in parentheses is the amount that would take an immediate hit next to the year listed. Then the remaining numbers in parentheses would come off in the 2nd year. Scroll down and see Rocknrolla's example of spreading CJ'S cap hit over 2 years for more clarification.

Here is the scheduled cap hits by year, numbers in parenthese are guaranteed amount for that year.

Charles Johnson

13: 13 million(6 million)

14: 15 million(6 million)

15: 16 million (6 million)

16: 11 million(0 of it guaranteed)

17: free agent

18 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Beason

13:9.5 million(4 million)

14: 10.750(4 million)

15:11.750(4 million)

16:9 million (0 of if guarnteed)

17:free agent

amount of dead money to be absorbed if cut;12 million(signing bonus)

Williams

13: 8.2 million(3.2)

14: 9.2 million(3.2)

15: 10.2 million(3.2)

16:free agent

amount to of dead money to be absorbed if cut; 9.6 million(signing bonus)

Jordan Gross

13:11.7 Million(1 million)

14:9.7(0 guarnteed)

15:free agent

1 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut.

Steve Smith

13:6.25 millon(2.5)

14:8 million(2.5)

15:11 million(2.5)

16:9 million(0 guaranteed)

17:free agent

6.5 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut.

Chris Gamble

13:7.9 million(2)

14:8.5 million(2)

15: free agent

4 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Jonathan Stewart

13:2.8 million(1.8)

14:5.55 million(1.8)

15:8.3 million(1.8)

16:9.05 million(1.8)

17:7.75 million(0 guaranteed)

18: free agent

7.2 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Charles Godfrey

13:3.7 million(1.1)

14:7.1 million(1.1)

15:7.1 million(1.1)

16:6.4 million(0 guarnteed)

17:free agent

3.3 million to be absorbed if cut

Thomas Davis:

13:4 million(1.66)

14:7 million(1.66)

15:11.56 million(1.66)

16: free agent

4.98 million to be absorbed if cut

Greg Olsen

13:6.35(500k)

14:7.825(500k)

15:7.825(500k)

16: free agent

1.5 million to be absorbed if cut

James Anderson

13:4.4(1.4)

14:4.4(1.4)

15:5.4(1.4)

16:free agent

4.2 million to be absorbed if cut

Ron Edwards

13:3.33(833k)

14:free agent

833k to be absorbed if cut

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA Experienced

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted

Just to correct you here, when you designate a June 1st cut it doesn't cut the cap hit in half for the two years, you take the normal cap hit for the first year and then the entire remainder the following year.

For example, if Charles Johnson was designated a June 1st cut the 2013 dead money cap hit would be $6 million, and the remainder ($12 million) would hit in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just to correct you here, when you designate a June 1st cut it doesn't cut the cap hit in half for the two years, you take the normal cap hit for the first year and then the entire remainder the following year.

For example, if Charles Johnson was designated a June 1st cut the 2013 dead money cap hit would be $6 million, and the remainder ($12 million) would hit in 2014.

oh poo, thats not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
Posted

Why cut Ron? He is basically playing for vet minimum and we are getting solid production. Cutting him opens up another big hole at DT.

Unfortunately, I see Williams out the door for sure. I think everyone else stays. Beason, Gamble, and Gross are MUCH too valuable to let loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Panthers agree to 1-year deal with RB Rico Dowdle

      By TD alt · Posted

      "Just $3 mil," you say. I don't understand why anyone would be upset about incentives. There is a reason they're there: to motivate and bring out the best in a player. I agree with you that we could've saved ourselves roughly $2.5 mil, at least, but it's certainly more risky to gamble on "potential," than to just pay for someone who has already proven themselves to be legit in the NFL. That being said, I'd have probably gambled. But I'm not overly concerned with the contract. There are more interesting things to talk about.
    • Swaggasaurus
      Reading the Tea Leaves: What Did Morgan Just Tell Us?

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      Return of the “smokescreen”. Huddle classic, I get it. i don’t think they are doing any covert operations here. If it’s offense, it’s Tet or Warren. But it’s likely to be one of those Georgia guys as an OLB, it’s the safest bet and probably where I would go if we stay at 8. Maybe even Starks at S if we trade down, although I’d feel the same about that as taking Golden. The wide receiver class this year is weird. You don’t see a lot of route separation on film. Restrepo is pretty good at it, Lacy is good at it but may have to play in prison league. Tet makes all his plays on “fug it Tet is down there somewhere” broken plays. Golden uses timing and speed changes to get him some space, but I’d like some of his routes to be more intentional. I also don’t think you can go in thinking track record. And it’s not just WR, outside of Kalil it’s been a train wreck for pretty much everything in R2 for us.  
    • MHS831
      Reading the Tea Leaves: What Did Morgan Just Tell Us?

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Lotta love for Warren here.  I am not high on a TE at 8--heck, last year Bowers did not go until around 12 or 13.  Plug and Play is a good point, and we could run some double tight with (in my opinion) two very effective TEs.  If it were down to those two, I think I would go with Johnson and have the best CB tandem--especially if we do not get a plug and play edge.  There are many ways to go....
×
×
  • Create New...