Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

connor or diggs as the starter


Recommended Posts

Connor's gonna have to sit another year before he gets a chance. He's not a stereotypical outside LB and Diggs has another year. I expect him to be fine next year. He'll get playing time, but he won't be starting. That same statement could be said for a dozen young players...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who would be the backup MLB
he could still be the back up MLB. beason was the back up MLB in his rookie year but he started at WLB. it's no big deal.

still, whoever shows himself to be the best at TC and going into the season should have the job. i don't care who that is at the moment. i just want the best one. i really hope that both of them are good enough to start at it, though.

diggs knowledge of the position and experience there will really come in handy with who we have to face next year, though. connor is still essentially a rookie as far as game experience is concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just had Thanksgiving meal with a couple dozen family and friends. I lucked out and got one of the smoked turkey legs. Stuffing, mashed taters and gravy, green bean casserole, sweet potato casserole, kale, smoked ham, chicken and rice, corn, lima beans, cranberry sauce, and great people. My brother got his guitar out and we got to singing. Lots of actual conversations with people I hardly  ever get to see, haven't seen in a while, or who I never met before. Just a great moment to remember.
    • 3-8 would be a higher win percentage than 3-9
    • Same... With the personnel the Niners had, that defense could have been historically good in the right hands. Under Wilks they were certainly good, they didn't quite rise to that level. Honestly, I see Wilks kinda like I see Rivera: fantastic person, decent head coach. Skill wise, phenomenal DB coach, so-so DC. His greatest strength is his leadership. Hard to find many better in that department. In the Xs and Os / execution area though, not as good. Bottom Line: Wilks is the sort of coach that needs a staff that excels in those aspects of the game where he's weaker. But, like Rivera, I don't know that he scouts assistants very well. That as much as anything might be why he's not in the NFL now.
×
×
  • Create New...