Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

cam and the no huddle


Gabeking

Recommended Posts

was cam running a no huddle for most of the tolbert TD drive? i didnt watch the game but i read that he was for that specific drive. leads me to the question if there are any splits out there with cam's stats in a huddle vs no huddle offense? i haven't seem him do it often so what do you guys think of cam running more of the no huddle instead of chud's cutesy wutesy play calling? basically im just curious on your guys opinion on cam and his past experience with the no huddle and mow much success has he had in the past with it compared to scripted plays(mostly with chud)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its called a 2 min offense that was helped by penalties

i just meant in general, like when cam is calling the shots compared to when chud is calling them.. not just that drive (im sure chud made the call to throw it 3 times in the EZ) but throughout his career

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is something Cam will eventually do more of. They have so much on his plate right now with the zone option reads to let him do much no huddle. My guess is it was a series of scripted plays comming out of halftime. A lot of it was running the ball. As Cam gets better at reading defenses it will be a good thing to do more of eventually. Right now he just isn't ready to play Peyton Manning at the LOS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I am not giving up on him yet but I do think we need to see a pretty big step up this season to be convinced he is a long term solution. It is a shame that his development seemed to be stunted in 2023. 
    • To put the question simply: Would you be happy with a Steelers trade that doesn't bring back their first-round pick next year? A potential trade between us and Pittsburgh is interesting because depending on which draft value chart you use, Pittsburgh has two totally natural trades available to them, but they're very different. The Jimmy Johnson chart says the difference between us at 8 and them at 21 is 600 points, or almost exactly the value of the last pick in the 1st round. That falls in line with how teams tend to discount future picks. 8 for 21 and next year's Pitt 1st is almost exactly equal. More modern charts (Chase Stuart, Fitz) are much flatter, and 8 for 21 and 83, Pittsburgh's next pick this year, are basically equal.  Now, the second one obviously won't actually happen--the Lions had to include pick 73 just to move from 29 to 24 last year, and Pittsburgh would clearly be making a much bigger jump. But given the flatness of this draft and the lack of blue-chip players at the top, would you accept some mix of 21, 83, and next year's non-first-rounders from Pittsburgh, or would you want Dan Morgan barred from every touching the draft again for accepting anything less than next year's first?
    • just ask XL, to date he is has never been wrong about what we are doing w/ our first pick
×
×
  • Create New...