Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

High School football question regarding the band


sunbunny

Recommended Posts

For the first time, we went to a game where their band didn't play in the stands. They just stood there. Is this the norm everywhere else? They're the only school in our conference that doesn't play at least something in the stands. I don't know if they play for TD's. The only time our band is quiet is when we're on O or a TO. Between our band and the student section, our stadium rocks.

Even other bands that come to our stadium play. Well, except this school's band. They don't come. No wonder one of their parents assaulted our band director last year if they're used to complete quiet to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Super_Freak

Strange, my daughters high school band played in the stands when the team was on defense and during breaks in the action. I went to most of the games during her 4 years and i still remember the set list lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My daughters band director didn't grasp the concept that you had to stop playing before the play started. The refs warned them, and they did it again. The ref told them not to play anything until the second half, and if they did, they wouldn't play this game or the next. He told the band to keep playing. The ref told them to leave, so he made them stand outside and play. The ref told the principal that the band was banned for the rest of the season, and if they made any more noise, the football team would start forfeiting games. He was unemployed the next week.

Band directors labor under the delusion that football was invented so they could play ay halftime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The refs have never said anything to our band about when to play or not to play, and this is our 5th year as band parents/boosters. Our principal demands our band travel to certain away games, even though our director would rather stay home. Hell, we bus our student section to most away games.

I can't speak for other directors regarding halftime, but ours views Friday nights as another practice show before competition on Saturdays. Your daughter must have had a shitty director. Our band practices all week, then football games, then they have to be at the school usually by 8 on Saturdays to leave for a competition. There's one competition where they are gone 14 hours.

Between our band, the student section with their own cheer director and those horn things, parents with air horns and cowbells, and the smoke from the grills that hangs low on the field, there's nothing like our stadium. Oh, and our visitor section is pretty much in the woods.

I felt like I was at a golf tournament last night. No cheering from their side, no band playing. They are the only school in our conference that is like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange, my daughters high school band played in the stands when the team was on defense and during breaks in the action. I went to most of the games during her 4 years and i still remember the set list lol

Let me guess, one was ESPN? lol We're on our 5th year as band parents. I hear that song in my sleep.

Up until this year, we knew all the cheers and dances, too. The cheerleaders had been doing the same routines since 03. New cheer coach this year, and she changed all the dances and cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know when I was in high school, the band wasn't allowed to play while during plays. Between plays and during timeouts/between quarters it was acceptable. They were pretty lenient though. If a band was finishing up while the ball was being snapped, they didn't care, as long as it ended before the next snap. If it didn't, they'd stop play and tell them to stop until a timeout/change of possession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know when I was in high school, the band wasn't allowed to play while during plays. Between plays and during timeouts/between quarters it was acceptable. They were pretty lenient though. If a band was finishing up while the ball was being snapped, they didn't care, as long as it ended before the next snap. If it didn't, they'd stop play and tell them to stop until a timeout/change of possession.

Yeah, that's how it is, but the director I was talking about was a dick who basically thought he could do what he wanted. Even when the refs warned him, he kept playing. About the time some of the parents got ready to take the kids out of the stands, the ref threw them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's how it is, but the director I was talking about was a dick who basically thought he could do what he wanted. Even when the refs warned him, he kept playing. About the time some of the parents got ready to take the kids out of the stands, the ref threw them out.

This is sunbunny's son. There's a school in our conference that had a parent walk up onto our director's podium while we were playing and threaten him. We had band parents AND students who were about to open a can of whoop-ass on him.Recently, we had an away game at that school and their band never played. They just stood there looking stupid. Football games are meant to be loud and exciting, otherwise, why would there even be an audience/crowd. In our conference, there are no set rules for when the band can play. In my opinion, if your school is wanting the band to stay quiet, why even have a band at the game. Plus, they're probably just mad because the football team sucks and they want them to at least attempt to win a game. I mean seriously, if the crowd can be as loud as they want to support their team, why can't the band be loud as well? Hypocrites.

I was in marching band for 4 years, so I think I know what I'm talking about when it comes to high school football games and marching bands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...