Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Read Option For Mobile QB's

beastson

By beastson,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted

Watching the Skins, that's fit for RG3 and a Vick. Mobile QB's

Cam isn't a mobile QB. He's just a QB that can run. There's a difference. I feel like we treating Cam like a girl. He's more than capable of standing in the pocket and gunning it around. Get better weapons and we'll be ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mwright350 Rising Star

mwright350

Posted
Posted

Yeah we have plenty of weapons. We could have more but our offensive personnel is not terrible.

Our biggest problem on offense is we're running a whack-a-doo offensive scheme that is just not going to work and we're too stubborn to do something different. After that execution by the players OF our whack-a-doo scheme. Talent doesn't really figure into that list.

I also agree that pigeon holing Cam into that "you must run around to be effective" role is stupid. He'll have some growing pains as a pocket passer but he has all the physical tools to BE a great pocket passer. Trying to avoid those growing pains by running this bullshit scheme is delaying the growing-pains at best and causing setbacks at worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nickzz Newbie

nickzz

Posted
Posted

Watching the Skins, that's fit for RG3 and a Vick. Mobile QB's

Cam isn't a mobile QB. He's just a QB that can run. There's a difference. I feel like we treating Cam like a girl. He's more than capable of standing in the pocket and gunning it around. Get better weapons and we'll be ok

wat

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

Cams a better option for it because he is durable. I said earlier this year RGIII will never make it out of the season alive if they keep allowing him to take those big hits. Still Cam has too much potential with his arm to wast running the Read. Let him run the Coryell like last year and mix in a few gimmicks. It was a stupid idea of chud to run it in the first place. WIth our RBs and line we could have ran a mean power O and had just as much success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

Cam isn't a mobile QB? Really? Because he is SELDOM chased down running straight line. He typically burns guys. Just because he's strong doesn't mean he's not mobile. That's like saying, "Peppers wasn't a versatile defensive end. He was just a defensive end who could occasionally outrun skill-position guys. There's a difference". No, dumbass, there isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Watching the Skins, that's fit for RG3 and a Vick. Mobile QB's

Cam isn't a mobile QB. He's just a QB that can run. There's a difference. I feel like we treating Cam like a girl. He's more than capable of standing in the pocket and gunning it around. Get better weapons and we'll be ok

Cam is the only one legitimately built and with the skill set to run it at this level.

Worked just fine last year.....and the 2 games this year we went for 200+ rushing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Cam is a pocket passer that has the ability to run. He's not a smaller QB like RG 3 that moves so fluently and can run the option to perfection. It was diff last year, thats why it worked and we also didn't run it like that last season like this season

You all understood my point I was making

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PadresPanthersFan
      Bears fire Matt Eberfus

      By PadresPanthersFan · Posted

      His o loaded with swift, dj, Keenan and Rome was inconsistent at best. The d was bad. And the game management was atrocious and lost them games.  He was terrible and made the team worse. I wish they kept him
    • MHS831
      High look overview...

      By MHS831 · Posted

      That is my point.  I think teams make a huge mistake when they pay their decent to average QBs top QB money because they feel that they have to match the market or lose their investment--There is no way, for example, that Tua or Prescott or Murray should all be making more than Mahomes--I mean, Dak makes $15m per season more than Mahomes. People say, "Well, when its his turn...." But that is not how it should be--so my point was that Bryce can be doing mediocre to good enough in 2 years, but the way it is going, you have to pay him at the starting QB rate--currently $60m.  So even if you think he will continue to improve, at $60 m, he would eliminate any chance for a ring---so my view is, if he is not elite, you cut him.  So you draft QBs now and see what you can make of them.
    • PappyMay
      High look overview...

      By PappyMay · Posted

      With two 4ths and three 5ths I’m hoping we can kill it on adding depth. Take a gamble with the two 7ths.  First 3 picks id love to address the defense. I expect Tuttle, Robinson, and Jewell to all be on the 2025 roster but not after that. Be a good time to add depth and let them develop a year.  
×
×
  • Create New...