Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A GM thread


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Everybody loves to pour it on Hurney because our team has only won more than 8 games 3 times over the past 10 seasons. The 11th season is far from over.

Please copy and paste these questions and bold your answer

,

Is Hurney more than 50% responsible for the 2010 disaster and how so?

Should GM'S and head coaches be held accountable together or seperately?

What is the biggest difference in the superbowl team in 03 and the 7-9 04 team?

What was the biggest difference from the 08 team that went 12-4 and the 09 team that went 7-9?

Everyone loves to say 3 winning seasons out 11, do you realize we have a winning record from 02-11.( if you throw out the 2010 lockout prep season where we had a lame duck headcoach)??- 2010 lockout prep year our record under Hurney is 77-67.

The worst move Hurney ever made was wasting a first round pick on Everette Brown. In hindsight the Otah one was pretty bad too, but nobody was complaining about it when we went 12-4 that year after finishing the previous season 7-9. Other blunders include wasted 2nd round picks. One was Edwards the other was Clausen.

I don't mind people bashing him or any player or coach as long as your objective about it.

In order to say he's terrible and his approach is terrible please consider how other teams are built.This is an excellent website to help you understand that.

http://www.profootba...sembled-charts/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Hurney more than 50% responsible for the 2010 disaster and how so?

Hurney is 58% responsible for the 2010 disaster. He is only 54% responsible for the 2011 disaster. The new coaching staff has limited Hurney's liability to the current 2012 disaster in progress to 47%, but taking history into consideration, experts are projecting Hurney's responsibility for next season's disaster at over 50%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney is 58% responsible for the 2010 disaster. He is only 54% responsible for tue 2011 disaster. The new coaching staff has limited Hurney's liability to the current 2012 disaster in progress to 47%, but taking history into consideration, experts are projecting Hurney's responsibility for next season's disaster at over 50%.

How did you arrive at those percentages?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He basically has managed for lack of a better word to get us one good season every 3/4 years or so

The feelings of 03 are well behind us and 05 & 08 weren't that special minus Smitty in 05 and Double Trouble in 08. He's overly clinging onto the only guys he was successful with wasting cash, not going after FAs that can help us out at areas OF NEED, and most importantly has not produced results in well over 3 years now regardless of getting lucky enough to get Cam or not.

It's a boiling point scenario and if we finish sub .500 yet again, it may hit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...