Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

keek?


Gabeking

Recommended Posts

It might be just me but he played extremely well when given the opportunity yesterday, but that seemed to be mostly in the first half because, correct me if im wrong, i didn't see him as much in the second half as i did in the first half? I don't see why we aren't using him in the middle because beast is not up to par as of yet as we can all see... But he seems to be improving drastically though as the season moves along, which is a great sign! What have you all thought of him so far about his play?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was one play early on where Kuechly called out a run to the right. He see him point before the ball is snapped. Sure enough it's a sweep right and Kuechly hits Turner for no gain. Would love if someone with hacker skillz could post the video of this.

How do u teach a rookie that? You can't. He either has it or he doesn't. It's obvious he has it, but this goddamn retarded coaching staff removes him from the game

I'm off the Rivera Chud wagon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Play him every damn down unless he wants a breather. Why he isn't getting more time is inexplicable. The more time he gets, the better he will be, and he already is a phenom. That play mentioned above when he sniffed out the plan before the snap says it all. Also, another one he got blocked out, broke off, chased the runner down and still made the stop after two or three others missed. This kid has the "it" factor and then some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I am not giving up on him yet but I do think we need to see a pretty big step up this season to be convinced he is a long term solution. It is a shame that his development seemed to be stunted in 2023. 
    • To put the question simply: Would you be happy with a Steelers trade that doesn't bring back their first-round pick next year? A potential trade between us and Pittsburgh is interesting because depending on which draft value chart you use, Pittsburgh has two totally natural trades available to them, but they're very different. The Jimmy Johnson chart says the difference between us at 8 and them at 21 is 600 points, or almost exactly the value of the last pick in the 1st round. That falls in line with how teams tend to discount future picks. 8 for 21 and next year's Pitt 1st is almost exactly equal. More modern charts (Chase Stuart, Fitz) are much flatter, and 8 for 21 and 83, Pittsburgh's next pick this year, are basically equal.  Now, the second one obviously won't actually happen--the Lions had to include pick 73 just to move from 29 to 24 last year, and Pittsburgh would clearly be making a much bigger jump. But given the flatness of this draft and the lack of blue-chip players at the top, would you accept some mix of 21, 83, and next year's non-first-rounders from Pittsburgh, or would you want Dan Morgan barred from every touching the draft again for accepting anything less than next year's first?
    • just ask XL, to date he is has never been wrong about what we are doing w/ our first pick
×
×
  • Create New...