MNF: Green Bay Packers @ Seattle Seahawks

[YoungPanthers89]

So some incompetent bafoons said he won....grats??

:)

[C47]

@TJLANG70 Got fuged by the refs.. Embarrassing. Thanks nfl

[Dilla]

"It's not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first & and the opponent subsequently gains joint control."

[C47]

He didn't even have joint control tho, he had his hand on the ball, that's about it...

[SmootsDaddy89]

Also Renner is likely to be a 1st round pick when he comes out so keep bragging how great Wilson is, since you'll only be able to say anything for maybe one more year.

[YoungPanthers89]

[YoungPanthers89]

Also Renner is likely to be a 1st round pick when he comes out so keep bragging how great Wilson is, since you'll only be able to say anything for maybe one more year.

Renner? seriously? Mr. snooze button?

[SmootsDaddy89]

Renner? seriously? Mr. snooze button?

He has fewer interceptions, a better QB rating, and only one less touchdown than Matt Barkley

[YoungPanthers89]

He has fewer interceptions, a better QB rating, and only one less touchdown than Matt Barkley

haha

[SmootsDaddy89]

In all seriousness I think if he keeps playing like he has the last two games and stays a 5th year, he'll be a top draft pick. He WAS highly recruited out of high school after all. It's not his fault he's had three coaches in three years.

[YoungPanthers89]

Reporter to Tate..."did you push off at the end". Tate..."I don't know what you're talking about...I don't know what you're talking about"....You know damn well what she's talking about...man I hope we beat these guys....

Onochutalbout. - Golden Tate

[Guest Hokebuck]

"It's not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first & and the opponent subsequently gains joint control."

Can't have control in the AIR must have both feet on the ground that did not happen! Simultaneously when both players are on the ground it's not a catch in the air! Touchdown Seattle the Refs got it right by the rules like it or not!

[nickzz]

definitely not a TD

[h0llywood]

The referee who made the touchdown call came from behind so he didn't have a clear initial view of the football until they were rolling around.. Once he actually made the call of a touchdown, he determined it was a simultaneous catch. If he was on the other side where the other referee was, he would have called a touchback. It was a split second moment and he made a call based on his position on the field and the interpretation of the rule book. I wouldn't fault him entirely.

I think the blame needs to whoever made the review. Since it was a scoring play on the last play of the game, I do not know if it is the head referee or "upstairs" makes the final determination. All I know that who ever it was, it was that person's fault.

My question is, is this worse than the Tuck Rule?