Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 76 Million Dollar Man


saX man

Recommended Posts

& our super athletic QB are back home this weekend playing imo our biggest rival

Cam, now feeling great with the help of a mind coach, should be looking to shut everyone up and do some great things...that's enough on that subject...moving on....

CJ, CJ, CJ: 5 games straight with no sacks

I'll admit he does get some pressure but nothing has told me he is work even half of the contract we gave him to prevent him from going to the Falcons. He needs to start proving it.

Out of everyone on our team, these two have plenty of things to get them ready to play lights out. I'm not trying to pile on any unneccesary expectations but just pointing out they are going to be wanting to shine.

Its how you react to the adversity and assholes out there when you really do shine. Even if we simply looked improved and show that we're beyond last weeks debacle, I will be a happy camper.

I think we should keep an eye on the 76 million dollar man this weekend. D'wan, Ron, Alexander, and even Keiser have proved he has help on the line...so bottom line: he needs to start showing up in a bigger way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He needs to have a game in which he takes it over on the defensive side of the ball.

Defensive players that make the kind of money that he is making, take over football games.

Charles Johnson hasn't done that yet.

Exactly what I was getting at

Honestly, I'm not trying to pile on the current low atm, but has CJ ever gone off and without a doubt taken over the trench war? He's had some great games but we are paying him top dollar for above average play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What did you guys expect? He was just going to morph into JPP this year? He's the same consistent player he was last year. We just overpaid him like we always do

Wasn't expecting an instant morph job but I'd at least like to see him step it up regardless of us overpaying (which sucks in the 1st place). We either clearly thought he could become even better than he was or were that desperate to keep the only decent part of our line from last season...so yeah, we should expect higher play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What did you guys expect? He was just going to morph into JPP this year? He's the same consistent player he was last year. We just overpaid him like we always do

I'm not sure what you mean by instant. He has been in the league twice as long as JPP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...