Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How good do you think the team would be under Rivera with a better GM?


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

Hypothetically speaking....

I mean Rivera's getting a lot of flak for this loss but let's look at how unbalanced the allocation of cap is. Why are we starting Bills' cuts at defensive tackle while we've got three starters sharing the load at RB? Why do we think we need three starters at running back when the Giants basically proved to us how productive a running game could be even when you're starting a guy who's been on like 40 rosters in the past 4 seasons, including ours?

What if Jerry Reese ran the team? Would his philosophy of "you can never have too many pass rushers" mesh well with the kind of defense Ron wants on his field?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this a trick question?

Better personnel on both our lines would be making many of our people now under performing look like superstars.

The Giants running back (as you pointed out) is a perfect example of this.

We used to build our team that way but some where along the way Hurney forgot that lesson.

Now he pays our running backs (a plentiful commodity in this league) like they are rare diamonds and we have no other positional needs to address.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much better, I think, if he didn't have to look at Carlos Rodgers and Asante Samuel and then go into a press conference and announce we're not interested.

We're starting a god damned 5th round rookie at CB. You can't tell me any coach wouldn't be better if their team was managed well enough that they had more options available to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets be honest here. Hurney builds a team off of his coaches preferences. The only time he may have ever made moves independently of the head coach was the 2010 draft, when Jerry decided he was going to let Fox go following the season.

When Rivera got here we 3 of his former players from the chargers right away. Naane,tutu,applewhite. This year we added that 3rd RB everybody seems to hate us having and guess what he came from the Chargers too. I am sure if Rivera thought it was a bad idea he could have had some veto power their.

We also went out and got 2 tight ends right away last year,something that was not on the previous roster because Fox had no use for them. I could go on and on but if you can't see all the changes made for Rivera's preferences since he got here you are blindly hating Hurney. Same could be said for Fox all the way through 09.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if we just payed for few FAs more often we would be in a better place right now. If Fox had one thing right it was to use Vets and pepper in Rookie. His first few years he was a master at that. If we would have kept to that we prob would be better right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On offense we have two pro-bowl linemen, a pro-bowl wideout, a franchise QB, exceptional running backs, and with all that we managed 7 points in garbage time against a team that got gashed by the Cowboys and Bucs. It's easier to make the talent argument on the defensive side of the ball, but I don't think it has much merit there either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if we just payed for few FAs more often we would be in a better place right now. If Fox had one thing right it was to use Vets and pepper in Rookie. His first few years he was a master at that. If we would have kept to that we prob would be better right now.

I disagree. Fox was starting DeShaun Foster over DeAngelo....nuff said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think they are holding back to see what they have in the young guys, but I think it's a near certainty at some point they will bring someone else in. Right now (assuming we keep 5 CBs which is normal), the top 5 IMO are: 1) Jaycee Horn 2) Mike Jackson 3) Chau Smith-Wade 4) Shemar Bartholomew  5) Akayleb Evans   Obviously Jaycee is the alpha in that room and paid as such. Need him to stay healthy and continue to play at a Pro-Bowl level. Mike Jack did pretty well all things considered last year, and they gave him lower-level starter money. Fair deal for both sides.  Smith-Wade showed some promise as a slot CB. I think low-key he's a lock for the team. Different size and skill set than the other CBs. Shemar Bartholomew was the most sought after waiver claim last preseason. Was 5th CB most and inactive most of last year. Had a few defensive and ST snaps. Nothing of note good or bad but too small a sample size to make any judgment. Akayleb Evans was a 2022 4th Rounder for the Vikings. Has started 19 games (including Week 18 for the Panthers) in his career and played in 43. Was pretty good in 2023 before getting injured and falling down the depth chart last year. There's some other guys on the outside looking in, but until they show more in training camp I dont see anyway they make the 53. And only Jaycee, Mike Jack, and Smith-Wade are locks to make this roster IMO.  
    • Was just reading the Ask the Old Guy story on the team's website and was shocked to see that only two 2nd Rounders have signed so far, 30 of them haven't. That isn't normal, the Texans really screwed things up for the rest of the league, no other explanation that I can think of for 30 of the 32 picks to still be unsigned at this point.
    • They need to address CB before season starts. This is not going to cut it. 
×
×
  • Create New...