Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kuechly


FirstRoundPick

Recommended Posts

Barron needs work in pass coverage. He was shaky all preseaon as it.

This just isn't correct. He didn't play in game one or four, played one series in game two and in game three, they held the Patriots to one rushing touchdown in the first half and he had an INT for a touchdown.

Also, to all the responses, I acknowledged Steve Smith's toughness. I think it's most likely just a coincidence that he wasn't involved in the game plan after the big hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just isn't correct. He didn't play in game one or four, played one series in game two and in game three, they held the Patriots to one rushing touchdown in the first half and he had an INT for a touchdown.

Also, to all the responses, I acknowledged Steve Smith's toughness. I think it's most likely just a coincidence that he wasn't involved in the game plan after the big hit.

It was a tipped ball against NE......tip drill. not coverage. Making a play yes, not an example of coverage ability

Barron had one good pass breakup....but overall wasn't good in coverage Sun....the opposite. I like the kid. David had a good game.....Barron had one good play.....with a lot of bad. Those type hits don't register as anything in my book. We have some guys on our team that will make those hits and they don't impress

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just isn't correct. He didn't play in game one or four, played one series in game two and in game three, they held the Patriots to one rushing touchdown in the first half and he had an INT for a touchdown.

Also, to all the responses, I acknowledged Steve Smith's toughness. I think it's most likely just a coincidence that he wasn't involved in the game plan after the big hit.

At times it looked like Carolina had determined that with Cam Newton (+0.1) at the helm they could immediately morph into the Al Davis’ Raiders. Passing deep (20+ yards) on 24% of throws was more, on average, than any QB attempted last year, and certainly not very successful. Throwing mostly post and go routes against the Buccaneer cornerbacks, Newton eschewed the vulnerable short middle of the field where rookies Lavonte David and Mark Barron were suffering growing pains; for example on the second offensive play of the game when Barron completely lost Greg Olsen.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2012/09/11/panthers-buccaneers-week-1/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do.

71 yards - 1 TD. Over a season that 1136 and 16TDs. So based on that data I do not think Graham got shutdown today. Of course, I didn't see Kuechly on Graham once during the game, so we either have an idiot coaching staff that choose not to shutdown the Saints* best receiving target, or our coaching staff knew that he didn't have the ability to do so which is fair because no LB can take on that assignment on their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging from these two games, and how many times they take Kuechly off the field, we wasted our first round pick this year. He's a tackling machine who's true position is MLB. So not only is he playing out of position, but we take him off the field for 75% of the defensive snaps. So far, Kuechly is a wasted pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging from these two games, and how many times they take Kuechly off the field, we wasted our first round pick this year. He's a tackling machine who's true position is MLB. So not only is he playing out of position, but we take him off the field for 75% of the defensive snaps. So far, Kuechly is a wasted pick.

So far you're an idiot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have three veteran linebackers. Thomas Davis is back for real, as is Beason, and Anderson led the team last year in tackles. Why would we rush to start a rookie, even one as talented as Kuechly?

Exactly. Nobody said he would be better than Beason, who is the defensive leader and rarely comes off the field. Then we have Anderson who is physical in coverage and can blitz, who also rotates with Davis and Luke in nickel packages. For these two trolls to think they can call our pick wasted is just admitting ignorance by using other words to do it.

Is our defense better? Clearly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me cutting my wrists must mean Kuechly is the best cover LBer of all time, and I just didn't know. You always attack the person and not the facts. If your whole post is to attack someone, it best just not to post.

Who's attacking who again? All you DO is attack the team.

Kuechly is a rookie on a defense that got two turnovers today, one for a TD.

You are never happy about anything. Says more about you than anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...