Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Secondary Concerns


TruCatzFan

Recommended Posts

Not overly thrilled with the cuts of some of our Seconday players. Namely at CB. We absolutely MUST stay healthy back there. We have zero depth. If there's one weakness on this team (besides ST's) it's our secondary.

Especially being in our division I think that we failed to address this area in a big way. I would not feel this way at all had Hogan not been put on the IR...

Something isn't adding up, I don't know what it is, but I think I smell a move in the very near future. If not by the opener I'd expect to see a new face one way or another by week 2.

Something just isn't sitting right with me on this...

Yeah, I'm not comfortable with our Secondary/CB. I think that we need a vet CB. I guess that there isn't one available that Rivera wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it wouldn't solidify the starting lineup but the raiders just released demarcus van dyke.. he'd be a dime nickel corner over josh thomas, would be a good nickel over cap't but that's his spot. coaches like him. DVD is 6'1 so he's got size on josh thomas and he runs a 4.2 so he's got speed. could help on ST also. that would upgrade the unit a little. note he was cut in favor of joselio hanson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To make room for a CB, I'd either look at a Letting go DJ Campbell, Jimmy, or Hartsock.

We just traded for our new S, Jones, to help out ST, so he should be safe. We really don't need Jimmy at all, and between Hartsock and Brockel, well Brockel's versatility and his epic TD against the Texans make him more valuable than Hartsock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The last child @ home has told me he wants to go to a game, so we're seeing vs Rams on the 30th
    • Did we really shut them down though? They had 369 yards of offense.   That is 9 more yards than they average per game and 53 more than we give up per game this year.   If a team gave up 369 yards per game on defense, they'd be the 7th worst defense in the league this year. Yes, I will give our defense credit for having the 4th down stand near our goal line as well as creating the fumble that stopped their first drive, as they did rise to the occasion then, but even the INT was just a ridiculous play/throw and handed it to us and they also missed a FG. We didn't force them into a single punt all game.  We had 1 sack on a QB who had 37 pass attempts. They had drives of 56, 49, 50, 43, 58, and 71 yards (while we only had 2 over 40 yards ourselves). We bent, a lot, but never really broke, partially due to the Packers own mistakes, that's a far cry from "shutting them down" in my opinion.  Again, this is why I'm critical of us after a day like today, I'm able to look beyond a final score and evaluate how we played on the whole, and we keep squeaking out these wins despite not playing well at all.  And yes, that is what great teams do, but they also play well in the majority of their games, where as all we seem to do is squeak out ugly wins without ever playing all that well. I'm not saying I'm unhappy that we won, I've never once said anything like that, but when week after week I see serious concerns with how we played, then I'm going to call out what I see.
    • Washington is going to have to do better than this
×
×
  • Create New...