Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just some historical perspective on the linebacker position


Fiz

Recommended Posts

i'm very interested to see jason williams' continued work at the spot. hopefully he's a guy that can play at MLB for as long as necessary without a drastic dropoff in production due to the guys around him. and if thomas davis comes back full strength by the season opener i wouldn't be surprised to see anderson-keuchly-davis packages with keuchly playing MLB to get the best players available on the field.

a whole lot hinges on beason's ability to return. arguably the entire season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops, looks like furryman wins this one. Phillips it has been, and dooooing well. He uses his hands well, but he always seems to mis-step. He moves his feet well, but he just doesn't flow to the ball. It is like he just does not have that sixth sense of where to be. Like he is a half step behind. He plays at the hole, not in or before the hole. Does that make sense?

Speaking of at the hole. Our D-line opened some holes last week. Am really looking forward to seeing if that was a fluke, or if

Rivera really got through to the troops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if Beason and Davis aren't going to play for much of the year what's the starting lineup looking like?

Anderson-Kuechly-????

i think it will probably look like it has the past couple weeks with phillips in the middle.

in the JJ 4-3 the weakside is just about as important and crucial as the middle...maybe even moreso. kuechly would continue wearing the green dot and would be running things, he'd just be doing it from the weakside which isn't that big of a deal.

as long as phillips keeps performing well they will probably keep it this way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes no sense (if Beason doesnt come back) to not have the best MLB to come out of college in the past 10 years, not play MLB for us.

why would he have to move? the role at the Will is just as important as the Mike in this D and kuechly would still be controlling things. seems the most solid line up if beason and davis miss any games is what we have right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...