Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just some historical perspective on the linebacker position


Fiz

Recommended Posts

So let's go back to 2002. The Panthers signed a free agent linebacker, and he was maybe the best player on the team. The defense was arguably designed to flow to his position, and he performed.

I'm talking of course about Mark Fields.

After the 2002 season, he was diagnosed with non-hodgkins lymphoma and would miss the entire 2003 season.

In 2004, the Panters would stumble out of the gates (due largely to injuries) and would end with a furious charge that fell short due to a miracle play by mike vick and a Jake Game against the New Orleans Saints** in week 17. however, what most people don't remember is the late season charged was spurred by a game against the poo awful 49ers.

Specifically, on one play. An interception by Mark Fields.

It'd taken him nearly half a season to get back in the full swing of things. That play was the first step in a memorable charge to the playoffs that fell just short.

I'm bringing this up because of a similar situation the Panthers now face. Arguably the two best players on defense, Beason and Davis, are coming off of major injuries. Obviously nothing as serious as cancer, but football limiting injuries nonetheless.

I do not think the Panthers will benefit from the contributions of these two players until well into the season. Beason probably blew out his achilles because he rushed himself back last year. Davis, well, not so much. He was injured on a play that would have torn anyone's knee to pieces.

Still, I don't think either will be at full strength until at least after the buy.

Luckily, the Panthers are in good position to weather that storm. they have like a billion nfl starting caliber linebackers.

I predict a second half defensive surge for the Panthers, with the coaches smartly rotating Beason and Davis in and out depending on situations.

If the team performs well in the first half, and can just tread water, the defense will surge in november, and have healthy difference makers heading into the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if Beason and Davis aren't going to play for much of the year what's the starting lineup looking like?

Anderson-Kuechly-????

He never said they wouldn't play, he pretty much said we won't see a impact out of them till they get into the swing of things. And their bodies adjust to the game again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had tendonitis in his achilles last summer, had a minor procedure done before the season began and then blew it out in the opener.

http://www.rotoworld.com/recent/nfl/4192/jon-beason

...It used to be an achilles tear was basically career-ending, however today any player as fit as Beason can come back strong. But it's still one of the most devastating injuries in a football sense and it still takes more than a year before you can even get back to playing speed, let alone back to prior form. I don't know if we'll see the old Beason at any point this season and I'm sure he won't look anything like his former self until at least around midpoint. At least we've got Luke to contribute at the LB position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember that 49er season changing game. Fox made a halftime adjustment. It stood out since they were so rare....got aggressive on D. Started to blitz heavily. Was a nice moment. He kept that mindset to finish that season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean it's not even like this was his worst game of the season... I'm not done with him by any means but this feels more the norm for him than the exception:/
    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
×
×
  • Create New...